Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38670809›Full record

ReviewDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2024

Mucosal impedance as a diagnostic tool for gastroesophageal reflux disease: an update for clinicians.

Matthew Marshall-Webb, Jennifer C Myers, David I Watson, Tim Bright, Taher I Omari, Sarah K Thompson

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Reflux Testing: Wireless pH, Impedance-pH, and Mucosal Impedance.Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew Marshall-WebbDiscipline of Surgery, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4312-046X
Jennifer C MyersDiscipline of Surgery, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2157-7098
David I WatsonDiscipline of Surgery, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7683-2693
Tim BrightDiscipline of Surgery, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Taher I OmariHuman Physiology and Centre for Neuroscience, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Sarah K ThompsonDiscipline of Surgery, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9908-6208
Flinders University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mucosal impedance is a marker of esophageal mucosal integrity and a novel technique for assessing esophageal function and pathology. This article highlights its development and clinical application for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), Barrett's esophagus, and eosinophilic esophagitis. A narrative review of key publications describing the development and use of mucosal impedance in clinical practice was conducted. A low mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) has been shown to be an independent predictor of response to anti-reflux therapy. MNBI predicts medication-responsive heartburn better than distal esophageal acid exposure time. Patients with equivocal evidence of GERD using conventional methods, with a low MNBI, had an improvement in symptoms following the initiation of PPI therapy compared to those with a normal MNBI. A similar trend was seen in a post fundoplication cohort. Strong clinical utility for the use of mucosal impedance in assessing eosinophilic esophagitis has been repeatedly demonstrated; however, there is minimal direction for application in Barrett's esophagus. The authors conclude that mucosal impedance has potential clinical utility for the assessment and diagnosis of GERD, particularly when conventional investigations have yielded equivocal results.

Indexed as

Barrett EsophagusElectric ImpedanceEosinophilic EsophagitisEsophageal MucosaGastroesophageal RefluxFemaleHumansMaleesophagealgastroesophageal reflux (GERD)impedancepH-impedance

Identifiers

PMID38670809
PMCPMC11360985
OpenAlexW4395699516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.