Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38670606›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Screening for those at risk for anxiety and depression warranting further clinical evaluation among patients presenting to breast services: a single-centre, cross-sectional study.

Sakina Husain, Shilpa Rao, Sridhar Suresh, Kevin Victor Albert Jesudoss, Balamurali Krishna, Jeffrey Pradeep Raj

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sakina HusainSeth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Shilpa RaoSeth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Sridhar SureshSeth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Kevin Victor Albert JesudossSt John's Research Institute, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Balamurali KrishnaPaediatrics, Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Jeffrey Pradeep RajPharmacology, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India jeffreyraj@sriramachandra.edu.in.ORCID 0000-0002-8621-6106
King Edward Memorial Hospital and Seth G.S. Medical College · INManipal Hospital · INSri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research · INSt.John's Medical College Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesStudies show that anxiety and depression are widespread across patients presenting to outpatient services for medical illnesses. We expect similar or even higher prevalence in patients with breast complaints owing to the relevance of breasts in terms of sexuality, identity and confidence. Thus, this study was proposed to estimate the prevalence and identify risk factors for being at risk for anxiety and depression in patients seeking breast services.

designDescriptive, cross-sectional study.

settingTertiary care teaching hospital in Mumbai, Western India.

participantsPatients seeking breast services for either benign or malignant conditions. OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of those at risk for clinical depression (defined as a score of ≥10 on Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and proportion of those at risk for clinical anxiety warranting further clinical evaluation (defined as a score of ≥10 on Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7) and their predictors.

resultsA total of 208 patients were screened, and 192 consenting patients were enrolled. The prevalence of those at risk for anxiety requiring further clinical evaluation was 46.4% (95% CI 39.2% to 53.7%) and for those at risk for major depression that warrants further clinical evaluation by a mental health provider was 29.7% (95% CI 23.3% to 36.7%). The predictors of anxiety were age (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.053; 95% CI 1.024 to 1.083; p<0.001) and postmenopausal status (aOR 2.475; 95% CI 1.200 to 5.103; p=0.014). The predictors of depression were age (aOR 0.954; 95% CI 1.927 to 0.981; p=0.001) and rural place of residence (aOR 2.362; 95% CI 1.023 to 5.433; p=0.044).

conclusionsThere is a high prevalence of being at risk for anxiety and depression among patients who seek breast services warranting further clinical evaluation. The predictors of being at risk for anxiety were higher age and postmenopausal status, and for those at risk for depression were young age and residing in rural areas.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionAdultAgedBreast DiseasesBreast NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk FactorsYoung AdultAnxiety disordersBreast surgeryDepression & mood disordersPatient Reported Outcome Measures

Identifiers

PMID38670606
PMCPMC11057253
OpenAlexW4395673797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.