Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38670477›Full record

ArticleClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association2024

Follow-Up Colonoscopy for Detection of Missed Colorectal Cancer After Diverticulitis.

Walker D Redd, Jennifer L Holub, Hazel B Nichols, Robert S Sandler, Anne F Peery

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Utility of Colonoscopy After Acute Colonic Diverticulitis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Walker D ReddDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Jennifer L HolubGastrointestinal Quality Improvement Consortium, Bethesda, Maryland.
Hazel B NicholsDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Robert S SandlerDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Anne F PeeryDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Electronic address: Anne_Peery@med.unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USImprovement Service · GB

Funding

PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIESP30DK034987 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Temitope O. Keku · 1985 to 2026
$30.5M
DIGESTIVE DISEASES EPIDEMIOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32DK007634 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROBERT S. SANDLER · 1990 to 2026
$7.4M
Risk Factors for Asymptomatic DiverticulosisR01DK094738 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KEKU, TEMITOPE O., SANDLER, ROBERT S. · 2012 to 2022
$4.8M
A prospective cohort study to determine the role of obesity in diverticulitisR01DK132050 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI anne peery · 2022 to 2026
$2.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK034987NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK094738NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK132050NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007634
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsColonoscopy often is recommended after an episode of diverticulitis to exclude missed colorectal cancer (CRC). This is a controversial recommendation based on limited evidence. We estimated the prevalence and odds of CRC and advanced colorectal neoplasia on colonoscopy in patients with diverticulitis compared with CRC screening.

methodsUsing data from the Gastrointestinal Quality Improvement Consortium registry, we performed a cross-sectional study with patients ≥40 years old undergoing outpatient colonoscopy for an indication of diverticulitis follow-up evaluation or CRC screening. The primary outcome was CRC. The secondary outcome was advanced colorectal neoplasia. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated.

resultsWe identified 4,591,921 outpatient colonoscopies performed for screening and 91,993 colonoscopies for diverticulitis follow-up evaluation. CRC prevalence was 0.33% in colonoscopies for screening and 0.31% in colonoscopies for diverticulitis. Compared with screening, patients with diverticulitis were less likely to have CRC (adjusted OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.94). CRC prevalence decreased to 0.17% in colonoscopies performed for diverticulitis only. Compared with screening, patients with diverticulitis as the only indication were less likely to have CRC (adjusted OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.36-0.68). CRC prevalence increased to 1.43% in patients with complicated diverticulitis. Compared with screening, patients with complicated diverticulitis were more likely to have CRC (adjusted OR, 3.57; 95% CI, 1.59-8.01).

conclusionsThe risk of CRC cancer is low in most patients with diverticulitis. Patients with complicated diverticulitis are the exception. Our results suggest that colonoscopy to detect missed CRC should include diverticulitis patients with a complication and those not current with CRC screening.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsDiverticulitisAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMissed DiagnosisPrevalenceColon CancerColonoscopyDiverticulitisMisdiagnosis

Identifiers

PMID38670477
PMCPMC11871553
OpenAlexW4395459115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.