Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38670151›Full record

ArticleReproduction & fertility2024

Cumulus matrix selection leads to isolation of spermatozoa with better motility, morphology, and lower DNA fragmentation.

Maria Handzhiyska, Rumiana Ganeva, Dimitar Parvanov, Margarita Ruseva, Petar Eftimov, Vilyana Georgieva, Denitsa Velikova, Georgi Stamenov

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproduction & fertility, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria HandzhiyskaM Handzhiyska, Research Department, Nadezhda Women's Health Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Rumiana GanevaR Ganeva, Research Department, Nadezhda Women's Health Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Dimitar ParvanovD Parvanov, Research and development, Nadezhda Women's Health Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Margarita RusevaM Ruseva, Research Department, Nadezhda Women's Health Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Petar EftimovP Eftimov, Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Vilyana GeorgievaV Georgieva, Andrology Department, Nadezhda Women's Health Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Denitsa VelikovaD Velikova, Andrology Department, Nadezhda Women's Health Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Georgi StamenovG Stamenov, Obsterics and Gynecology Department, Nadezhda Women's Health Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Alexandrovska Hospital · BGSofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski" · BG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the motility, morphology, and levels of DNA fragmentation of spermatozoa subjected to conventional swim-up or cumulus matrix (CM) sperm selection. Semen samples were collected from 60 normozoospermic men at a private hospital between December 2021 and March 2022. After liquefaction, semen samples were separated into two portions - one part was subjected to conventional swim-up preparation and the remaining spermatozoa were subjected to CM selection. The CM was obtained by mechanical isolation from healthy donor oocytes. Semen analysis and evaluation of sperm were performed according to WHO 6th Edition Laboratory Manual and Kruger's strict criteria, respectively. Sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF, %) of the two preparations was evaluated using Halosperm G2 detection kit (Halotech, Madrid, Spain). Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare the characteristics of spermatozoa obtained by the two preparations. Spermatozoa selected by CM showed significantly better rapidly progressive motility (43.5% vs. 30.6%, respectively, p<0.001), higher percentage of morphologically normal forms (14.0% vs. 9.0%, respectively, p<0.05), and lower levels of SDF (26.0% vs. 45.0%, p<0.05) in comparison to those prepared by conventional swim-up. Moreover, the incidence of multiple sperm defects was considerably lower in the samples that underwent CM selection compared to those that did not (30.0% vs. 49.0%, respectively, p<0.05).The selection by CM significantly increases sperm motility and reduces morphologically abnormal spermatozoa and DNA fragmentation rates in comparison to the conventional swim-up preparation. The application of this selection technique may increase chances of successful IVF outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID38670151
PMCPMC11227069
OpenAlexW4395481374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.