ArticleGenome biology and evolution2024
Duplicate Gene Expression and Possible Mechanisms of Paralog Retention During Bacterial Genome Expansion.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel insights into retrogene evolution and cold adaptation in the alpine plant Crucihimalaya himalaica (Brassicaceae).BMC biology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Gene duplication contributes to the evolution of expression and the origin of new genes, but the relative importance of different patterns of duplicate gene expression and mechanisms of retention remains debated and particularly poorly understood in bacteria. Here, we investigated gene expression patterns for two lab strains of the cyanobacterium Acaryochloris marina with expanding genomes that contain about 10-fold more gene duplicates compared with most bacteria. Strikingly, we observed a generally stoichiometric pattern of greater combined duplicate transcript dosage with increased gene copy number, in contrast to the prevalence of expression reduction reported for many eukaryotes. We conclude that increased transcript dosage is likely an important mechanism of initial duplicate retention in these bacteria and may persist over long periods of evolutionary time. However, we also observed that paralog expression can diverge rapidly, including possible functional partitioning, for which different copies were respectively more highly expressed in at least one condition. Divergence may be promoted by the physical separation of most Acaryochloris duplicates on different genetic elements. In addition, expression pattern for ancestrally shared duplicates could differ between strains, emphasizing that duplicate expression fate need not be deterministic. We further observed evidence for context-dependent transcript dosage, where the aggregate expression of duplicates was either greater or lower than their single-copy homolog depending on physiological state. Finally, we illustrate how these different expression patterns of duplicated genes impact Acaryochloris biology for the innovation of a novel light-harvesting apparatus and for the regulation of recA paralogs in response to environmental change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.