ArticleBlood advances2024
Venous thromboembolism characteristics and outcomes among RIETE patients tested and untested for inherited thrombophilia.
Article in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02832245 (Computerized Registry of Patients With Venous Thromboembolism), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Computerized Registry of Patients With Venous Thromboembolism (RIETE)
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recurrent VTE in patients with thrombophilia after stopping anticoagulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Blood advances · 2026Pooled it
- Thrombophilia testing: does it truly affect risk?Blood advances · 2026Article
- Estrogen-associated thrombosis and the road not taken.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Beyond the Thrombophilia Panel: Real-World Overuse, Limited Interpretability, and Poor Guideline Concordance in a Hematology Referral Cohort.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Characterization of anticoagulated patients in a Latin American country: indications, treatment patterns, and complications.Thrombosis journal · 2026Article
- Inherited thrombophilia in a Han Chinese family caused by prothrombin Ile441Met mutation.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
- Prevalence and factors associated with high-risk thrombophilia: a single-center cross-sectional study of 3550 patients at a tertiary Thrombosis Centre in Switzerland.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
- Thrombophilia testing: does practice follow guidelines?Blood advances · 2024Article
- Antithrombin: Deficiency, Diversity, and the Future of Diagnostics.Mass spectrometry reviewsReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractInherited thrombophilia (IT) workup is commonly pursued in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). Recent American Society of Hematology guidelines recommend a selective approach to IT testing, nevertheless, evidence on whether thrombophilia testing can actually improve patient-important outcomes through tailored management is limited. Data from the large, prospective Registro Informatizado de Enfermedad TromboEmbólica (RIETE) registry were analyzed to compare VTE risk factors, management, and outcomes between patients who were tested for IT and untested patients, during anticoagulant treatment and after its discontinuation. Among 103 818 patients enrolled in RIETE, 21 089 (20.3%) were tested for IT, 8422 (8.1%) tested positive, and 82 729 (79.7%) were not tested. IT testing was more frequent in patients with VTE provoked by minor risk factors and less common in those with major risk factors such as surgery or active cancer. Choices of anticoagulant treatment did not differ based on IT testing results. Untested patients exhibited inferior outcomes across all VTE categories, with higher rates of VTE recurrence, major bleeding, mortality, and notably, cancer-related mortality. After treatment discontinuation, IT-negative patients with surgically provoked VTE showed lower recurrence rates. For immobilization-related VTE as well as in estrogen-related VTE, no significant differences in recurrence rates were observed between IT-negative and IT-positive patients. However, IT-negative patients with pregnancy or postpartum-related VTE had significantly lower recurrence rates. Patients with unprovoked VTE, particularly those testing positive for IT, had high recurrence rates after treatment. These findings underscore the complex role of IT testing in managing VTE, supporting personalized treatment strategies that consider VTE risk factors and comorbidities. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02832245.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.