Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38669328›Full record

ArticleScience advances2024

A vast repertoire of secondary metabolites potentially influences community dynamics and biogeochemical processes in cold seeps.

Xiyang Dong, Tianxueyu Zhang, Weichao Wu, Yongyi Peng, Xinyue Liu, Yingchun Han, Xiangwei Chen, Zhizeng Gao, Jinmei Xia, Zongze Shao and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Wringing everything out with bioprospecting.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiyang DongKey Laboratory of Marine Genetic Resources, Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xiamen 361005, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9224-5923
Tianxueyu ZhangSchool of Oceanography, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China.ORCID 0009-0000-5653-5029
Weichao WuShanghai Engineering Research Center of Hadal Science and Technology, College of Marine Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8728-5990
Yongyi PengKey Laboratory of Marine Genetic Resources, Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xiamen 361005, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1037-3957
Xinyue LiuKey Laboratory of Marine Genetic Resources, Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xiamen 361005, China.ORCID 0009-0008-0783-0492
Yingchun HanKey Laboratory of Marine Genetic Resources, Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xiamen 361005, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3964-6768
Xiangwei ChenKey Laboratory of Marine Genetic Resources, Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xiamen 361005, China.
Zhizeng GaoSchool of Marine Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8176-0727
Jinmei XiaKey Laboratory of Marine Genetic Resources, Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xiamen 361005, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9499-5560
Zongze ShaoKey Laboratory of Marine Genetic Resources, Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xiamen 361005, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4784-090X
Chris GreeningDepartment of Microbiology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7616-0594
Ministry of Natural Resources · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute · AUShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNShanghai Ocean University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In deep-sea cold seeps, microbial communities thrive on the geological seepage of hydrocarbons and inorganic compounds, differing from photosynthetically driven ecosystems. However, their biosynthetic capabilities remain largely unexplored. Here, we analyzed 81 metagenomes, 33 metatranscriptomes, and 7 metabolomes derived from nine different cold seep areas to investigate their secondary metabolites. Cold seep microbiomes encode diverse and abundant biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs). Most BGCs are affiliated with understudied bacteria and archaea, including key mediators of methane and sulfur cycling. The BGCs encode diverse antimicrobial compounds that potentially shape community dynamics and various metabolites predicted to influence biogeochemical cycling. BGCs from key players are widely distributed and highly expressed, with their abundance and expression levels varying with sediment depth. Sediment metabolomics reveals unique natural products, highlighting uncharted chemical potential and confirming BGC activity in these sediments. Overall, these results demonstrate that cold seep sediments serve as a reservoir of hidden natural products and sheds light on microbial adaptation in chemosynthetically driven ecosystems.

Indexed as

Geologic SedimentsMetagenomeMicrobiotaArchaeaBacteriaCold TemperatureEcosystemMetabolomeMetabolomicsMetagenomicsMultigene FamilyPhylogenySecondary Metabolism

Identifiers

PMID38669328
PMCPMC11051675
OpenAlexW4395661412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.