Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38669302›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Mental health status in healthcare workers during COVID-19 pandemic: An online questionnaire study in the southwest Iran.

Sara Sarvandian, Shima Hosseinpour, Khojasteh Hoseinynejad, Reza Davasaz Irani, Sirus Pakseresht, Zahra Rahimi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sara SarvandianDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Clinical Sciences Research Institute, School of Health, Ahvaz Jundisapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Shima HosseinpourExpert in Charge of Preventing Substance and Alcohol Use, Vice Chancellor for Health, Khuzestan Health Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Khojasteh HoseinynejadFaculty of Medicine, Department of Physiology, Persian Gulf Physiology Research Center, Medical Basic Sciences Research Institute, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Reza Davasaz IraniDepartment of Mental Health, The Health Center of Khuzestan Province, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Sirus PaksereshtDepartment of Psychiatry, Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Zahra RahimiDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Clinical Sciences Research Institute, School of Public Health, Hearing Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-4436-9152
Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate Mental Health Status, such as stress, anxiety, or depression symptoms, during the Covid-19 pandemic in healthcare workers at Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences.

methodsThis study is an online cross-sectional study conducted on healthcare professionals at Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Science from November 25, 2020, to March 30 2021. PHQ9 and Kessler collected outcome variables of depression, anxiety, and psychological distress questionnaires.

resultsIn total, 2552 healthcare workers in 24 hospitals and 212 Comprehensive health centers were enrolled in this study. The mean age of participants was 37.94 ± 8.07 years, and 25.3% were male. There was a significant difference between the mean Kessler and PHQ9 Scale scores on males and females (P< 0.001). Also, the results showed a significant difference between depression, anxiety, and stress and working in the intensive care unit. According to the result of the Kessler scale, 27% of participants had moderate to severe. Most respondents (65.5%) in all professions had moderate to severe mental distress scores according to the Kessler scale. The logistic regression model results illustrated the relationship between depression and anxiety with gender, workplace, support from families, and collogue job satisfaction, and feeling the stress of media coverage of COVID-19 were statistically significant (P< 0.05).

conclusionsThe present study revealed that medical and health workers suffer from mental health problems. In this study, up to one-fifth of medical staff had stress, anxiety, or depression symptoms, and more than half had psychological distress. Low educational level, lack of family support, lack of colleague's support, and being a female were the significant risk factors for stress, anxiety, and psychological distress in medical staff.

Indexed as

AnxietyCOVID-19DepressionHealth PersonnelMental HealthPandemicsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIranMaleMiddle AgedPsychological DistressSARS-CoV-2Stress, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID38669302
PMCPMC11051651
OpenAlexW4395661722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.