Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38669258›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Cervical microbiota dysbiosis associated with high-risk Human Papillomavirus infection.

Natalia Zeber-Lubecka, Maria Kulecka, Michalina Dabrowska, Katarzyna Baginska-Drabiuk, Maria Glowienka-Stodolak, Andrzej Nowakowski, Aneta Slabuszewska-Jozwiak, Bożena Bednorz, Ilona Jędrzejewska, Magdalena Piasecka and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Natalia Zeber-LubeckaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4036-3191
Maria KuleckaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Michalina DabrowskaDepartment of Genetics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Katarzyna Baginska-DrabiukDepartment of Genetics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Maria Glowienka-StodolakDepartment of Genetics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Andrzej NowakowskiDepartment of Cancer Prevention, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5997-7516
Aneta Slabuszewska-JozwiakFirst Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7146-6295
Bożena BednorzDepartment of Cancer Prevention, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Ilona JędrzejewskaDepartment of Cancer Prevention, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Magdalena PiaseckaDepartment of Cancer Prevention, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Jolanta PawelecDepartment of Cancer Prevention, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Elzbieta Wojciechowska-LampkaDepartment of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Jerzy OstrowskiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-risk Human Papillomavirus (HR-HPV) genotypes, specifically HPV16 and HPV18, pose a significant risk for the development of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer. In the multifaceted cervical microenvironment, consisting of immune cells and diverse microbiota, Lactobacillus emerges as a pivotal factor, wielding significant influence in both stabilizing and disrupting the microbiome of the reproductive tract. To analyze the distinction between the cervical microbiota and Lactobacillus-dominant/non-dominant status of HR-HPV and non-infected healthy women, sixty-nine cervical swab samples were analyzed, included 44 with HR-HPV infection and healthy controls. All samples were recruited from Human Papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening program and subjected to 16s rRNA sequencing analysis. Alpha and beta diversity analyses reveal no significant differences in the cervical microbiota of HR-HPV-infected women, including 16 and 18 HPV genotypes, and those with squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL), compared to a control group. In this study we identified significantly lower abundance of Lactobacillus mucosae in women with HR-HPV infection compared to the control group. Furthermore, changes in bacterial diversity were noted in Lactobacillus non-dominant (LND) samples compared to Lactobacillus-dominant (LD) in both HR-HPV-infected and control groups. LND samples in HR-HPV-infected women exhibited a cervical dysbiotic state, characterized by Lactobacillus deficiency. In turn, the LD HR-HPV group showed an overrepresentation of Lactobacillus helveticus. In summary, our study highlighted the distinctive roles of L. mucosae and L. helveticus in HR-HPV infections, signaling a need for further research to demonstrate potential clinical implications of cervical microbiota dysbiosis.

Indexed as

Cervix UteriDysbiosisLactobacillusMicrobiotaPapillomavirus InfectionsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleHuman papillomavirus 16Human papillomavirus 18HumansMiddle AgedUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID38669258
PMCPMC11051640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.