ArticleSTAR protocols2024
Protocol to process crosslinking and immunoprecipitation data into annotated binding sites.
Article in STAR protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- PARANOiD: Pipeline for Automated Read ANalysis of iCLIP Data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Here, we present a protocol for using Skipper, a pipeline designed to process crosslinking and immunoprecipitation (CLIP) data into annotated binding sites. We describe steps for partitioning annotated transcript regions and fitting data to a beta-binomial model to call windows of enriched binding. From raw CLIP data, we detail how users can map reproducible RNA-binding sites to call enriched windows and perform downstream analysis. This protocol supports optional customizations for different use cases. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Boyle et al.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.