Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38669081›Full record

SynthesisJournal of behavioral addictions2024

Problematic smartphone use and academic achievement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Adrian Paterna, Manuel Alcaraz-Ibáñez, Jose M Aguilar-Parra, Carlos Salavera, Zsolt Demetrovics, Mark D Griffiths

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Motivation Profiles Towards Academic Reading, Substance-Related and Problematic Behaviors in Future Teachers.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adrian Paterna1Health Research Centre and Department of Education, University of Almería, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7561-9487
Manuel Alcaraz-Ibáñez1Health Research Centre and Department of Education, University of Almería, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1297-9565
Jose M Aguilar-Parra1Health Research Centre and Department of Education, University of Almería, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6703-0680
Carlos Salavera2Department of Psychology and Sociology, University of Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8072-2390
Zsolt Demetrovics3Centre of Excellence in Responsible Gaming, University of Gibraltar, Gibraltar, Gibraltar.ORCID 0000-0001-5604-7551
Mark D Griffiths5Psychology Department, Nottingham Trent University, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3070-1804

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: The present study aimed to synthesize existing quantitative evidence on the relationship between problematic smartphone use (PSU) and academic achievement with a focus on quantifying its magnitude and examining its potential moderators. Methods: Eligible studies were searched for up to February 10, 2023 in six different databases (i.e., MEDLINE, Current Contents Connect, PsycINFO, Web of Science, SciELO, and Dissertations & Theses Global). Studies were considered eligible if they provided information derived from self-report instruments that allowed statistical calculation of the relationship between PSU and academic achievement. Pooled effect sizes (r) were computed using a random-effects model. Meta-regressions were conducted to test the influence of study-level moderators on the relationship of interest. Influence analyses and a three-parameter selection model (3PSM) were conducted to examine the robustness of the results and publication bias, respectively. Results: A total of 33 effect sizes from 29 studies (n = 48,490) were retrieved. Results showed a small effect size (r = -0.110), which tended to be larger in samples consisting of students from elementary and middle schools. Discussion and Conclusions: Findings from the present study contribute to the understanding of a potential determinant of decreased academic achievement by providing evidence that PSU may be one of them.

Indexed as

Academic SuccessInternet Addiction DisorderChildHumansSmartphoneStudentshuman-computer interfacemedia in educationproblematic smartphone use; smartphone dependencesmartphone addiction

Identifiers

PMID38669081
PMCPMC11220804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.