Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38668994›Full record

ArticleFrontline gastroenterology2024

Colonoscopic cancer detection rate: a new performance measure - is it FIT for purpose?

Khalid Bashir, Iosif Beintaris, Linda Sharp, Julia Newton, Katherine Elliott, Jon Rees, Peter Rogers, Matt Rutter

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontline gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. FIT for the future.Frontline gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Khalid BashirUniversity Hospital of North Tees, Stockton-on-Tees, UK.
Iosif BeintarisGastroenterology, North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton-on-Tees, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8477-2918
Linda SharpInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Julia NewtonAcademic Health Science Network for the North East and North Cumbria, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Katherine ElliottNorthern Cancer Alliance and GP Spring Terrace North Shields, North Shields, UK.
Jon ReesSchool of Psychology Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK.
Peter RogersWeblogik.co.uk, Ipswich, UK.
Matt RutterGastroenterology, North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton-on-Tees, UK.
North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust · GBAcademic Health Science Network North East and North Cumbria · GBNewcastle University · GBUniversity Hospital of North Tees · GBUniversity of Sunderland · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Gastrointestinal symptoms correlate poorly with cancer diagnosis. A faecal immunochemical test (FIT) result of ≥10 µg has high sensitivity and negative predictive value for colorectal cancer (CRC) detection. An FIT-based diagnostic pathway may lead to more effective resource utilisation. We aimed to use National Endoscopy Database (NED) data to create a new colonoscopy performance measure, cancer detection rate (CDR) to assess the appropriate identification of target populations for colonoscopy; then to use CDR to assess the impact of implementing an FIT-based referral pathway locally. Methods: NED data were analysed to compare local diagnostic colonoscopic CDR in 2019 (prepathway revision) and 2021 (postpathway revision), benchmarked against overall national CDR for the same time frames. Results: 1, 123, 624 NED diagnostic colonoscopies were analysed. Locally, there was a significant increase in CDR between 2019 and 2021, from 3.01% (2.45%-3.47%) to 4.32% (3.69%-4.95%), p=0.003. The CDR increase was due to both a 10% increase in the number of CRCs detected and a 25% reduction in the number of diagnostic colonoscopies performed. Nationally, there was a smaller, but significant, increase in CDR from 2.02% (1.99%-2.07%) to 2.33% (2.29%-2.37%), p<0.001. The rate of increase in CDR% between 2019 and 2021 was significantly different locally compared with nationally. Conclusion: Our study indicates that the introduction of a robustly vetted FIT-based algorithm to determine whether diagnostic colonoscopy is required, is effective in increasing the colonoscopic CDR. Moreover, CDR appears to be a meaningful performance metric that can be automatically calculated through NED, enabling monitoring of the quality of referral and vetting pathways.

Indexed as

colorectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID38668994
PMCPMC11042456
OpenAlexW4389504935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.