Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38668988›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2024

Does pain intensity after total knee arthroplasty depend on somatosensory functioning in knee osteoarthritis patients? A prospective cohort study.

Sophie Vervullens, Lotte Meert, Rob J E M Smeets, Jonas Verbrugghe, Peter Verdonk, Mira Meeus

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05380648 (Predicting Outcome of Total Knee Replacement Surgery in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05380648 completednot on this map

Predicting Outcome of Total Knee Replacement Surgery in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: a Prospective Study on the Role of Altered Central Pain Processing and Structural, Functional, Metabolic, Inflammatory and Psychological Factors

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversiteit AntwerpenRan2018 to 2023Enrolled223ConditionsOsteoarthritis, Knee, Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeArmsTotal knee arthroplasty
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sophie VervullensResearch Group MOVANT, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium. s.vervullens@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3409-8504
Lotte MeertResearch Group MOVANT, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Rob J E M SmeetsResearch School CAPHRI, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Jonas VerbruggheResearch Group MOVANT, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Peter VerdonkORTHOCA, Antwerp, Belgium and ASTARC Department, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium.
Mira MeeusResearch Group MOVANT, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 11E5722NUniversiteit Antwerpen BOF PS ID: 42517
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study is to determine whether the change in pain intensity over time differs between somatosensory functioning evolution profiles in knee osteoarthritis (KOA) patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This longitudinal prospective cohort study, conducted between March 2018 and July 2023, included KOA patients undergoing TKA in four hospitals in Belgium and the Netherlands. The evolution of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscale pain over time (baseline, 3 months, and 1 year post-TKA scores) was the outcome variable. The evolution scores of quantitative sensory testing (QST) and Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) over time (baseline and 1 year post-TKA scores) were used to make subgroups. Participants were divided into separate normal, recovered, and persistent disturbed somatosensory subgroups based on the CSI, local and widespread pressure pain threshold [PPT] and heat allodynia, temporal summation [TS], and conditioned pain modulation [CPM]. Linear mixed model analyses were performed. Two hundred twenty-three participants were included. The persistent disturbed somatosensory functioning group had less pronounced pain improvement (based on CSI and local heat allodynia) and worse pain scores 1 year post-TKA (based on CSI, local PPT and heat allodynia, and TS) compared to the normal somatosensory functioning group. This persistent group also had worse pain scores 1 year post-TKA compared to the recovered group (based on CSI). The study suggests the presence of a "centrally driven central sensitization" subgroup in KOA patients awaiting TKA in four of seven grouping variables, comprising their less pain improvement or worse pain score after TKA. Future research should validate these findings further. The protocol is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05380648).

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeOsteoarthritis, KneePain MeasurementAgedBelgiumFemaleHumansHyperalgesiaLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPain ThresholdPostoperative PainProspective StudiesCentral sensitizationChronic postoperative painKnee osteoarthritisSomatosensory functioningTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID38668988
PMCPMC11111543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.