ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024
DNA Isolation Long-Read Genomic Sequencing in Ctenophores.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Long-read sequencing has proven the necessity for high-quality genomic assemblies of reference species, including enigmatic ctenophores. Obtaining high-molecular-weight genomic DNA is pivotal to this process and has proven highly problematic for many species. Here, we discuss different methodologies for gDNA isolation and present a protocol for isolating gDNA for several members of the phylum Ctenophora. Specifically, we describe a Pacific Biosciences library construction method used in conjunction with gDNA isolation methods that have proven successful in obtaining high-quality genomic assemblies in ctenophores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38668967What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.