ArticleRadiological physics and technology2024
Predicting oxygen needs in COVID-19 patients using chest radiography multi-region radiomics.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective is to evaluate the performance of blood test results, radiomics, and a combination of the two data types on the prediction of the 24-h oxygenation support need for the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. In this retrospective cohort study, COVID-19 patients with confirmed real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay (RT-PCR) test results between February 2020 and August 2021 were investigated. Initial blood cell counts, chest radiograph, and the status of oxygenation support used within 24 h were collected (n = 290; mean age, 45 ± 19 years; 125 men). Radiomics features from six lung zones were extracted. Logistic regression and random forest models were developed using the clinical-only, radiomics-only, and combined data. Ten repeats of fivefold cross-validation with bootstrapping were used to identify the input features and models with the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Higher AUCs were achieved when using only radiomics features compared to using only clinical features (0.94 ± 0.03 vs. 0.88 ± 0.04). The best combined model using both radiomics and clinical features achieved highest in the cross-validation (0.95 ± 0.02) and test sets (0.96 ± 0.02). In comparison, the best clinical-only model yielded AUCs of 0.88 ± 0.04 in cross-validation and 0.89 ± 0.03 in test set. Both radiomics and clinical data can be used to predict 24-h oxygenation support need for COVID-19 patients with AUC > 0.88. Moreover, the combination of both data types further improved the performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38668939What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.