Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38668853›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2024

Switching to subtenon triamcinolone acetonide does not jeopardize the functional and anatomic outcomes of dexamethasone implant treated eyes with diabetic macular edema.

Ysé Borella, Samuel Bertaud, Ramin Tadayoni, Bahram Bodaghi, Bénédicte Dupas, Sara Touhami

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ysé BorellaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Sorbonne Université, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, 75013, Paris, France.
Samuel BertaudOphthalmology Department, Université de Paris, APHP, Hôpital Lariboisière, 75010, Paris, France.
Ramin TadayoniOphthalmology Department, Université de Paris, APHP, Hôpital Lariboisière, 75010, Paris, France.
Bahram BodaghiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Sorbonne Université, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, 75013, Paris, France.
Bénédicte DupasOphthalmology Department, Université de Paris, APHP, Hôpital Lariboisière, 75010, Paris, France.
Sara TouhamiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Sorbonne Université, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, 75013, Paris, France. sara.touhami@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8346-3067

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntraocular dexamethasone implant (DEXi) is an efficient treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME). However, it may be unavailable or contraindicated. Triamcinolone acetonide is another corticosteroid that has proved to be safe and effective in treating macular edema complicating various diseases including diabetes. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of a switch from DEXi to subtenon triamcinolone acetonide (STTA) and back, in eyes with DME.

methodsRetrospective study. DME eyes that had been treated with DEXi and switched to STTA between October 2018 and February 2019 (stock shortage of DEXi) were included. The functional and anatomical outcomes of the switch and switch-back were studied.

results26 eyes of 17 patients (mean age 67.1 ± 8.2 years) were considered. The mean baseline visual acuity (VA) was 0.35 ± 0.17 decimals remaining stable after DEXi, STTA and switch-back to DEXi. The mean central macular thickness (CMT) was 492.7 ± 32.8 µm initially, decreasing to 294.3 ± 133.4 µm after DEXi, 369.9 ± 182.3 µm after STTA and 297.6 ± 72.0 µm after switching back to DEXi (all p < 0.05 versus baseline). Compared to baseline, the CMT reduction was numerically better after DEXi and switching back to DEXi than after STTA (mean reduction: -200.4 µm, -167.7 µm, and -95.08 µm respectively, p = 0.13). Intraocular pressure was comparable after DEXi and STTA.

conclusionDEXi is the steroid of choice in DME. However, STTA can be a cost-effective alternative when DEXi is unavailable or contraindicated. This study suggests that STTA may be used in the context of a step therapy in DME.

Indexed as

DexamethasoneDiabetic RetinopathyDrug ImplantsGlucocorticoidsMacular EdemaTenon CapsuleTomography, Optical CoherenceTriamcinolone AcetonideVisual AcuityAgedDrug SubstitutionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMacula LuteaDexamethasoneDrug ImplantsGlucocorticoidsTriamcinolone AcetonideDexamethasone implantDiabetic macular edemaSubtenon triamcinolone acetonideSwitch

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.