Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38668790›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

Spanish translation and validation of the Music-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (MuRQoL) in postlingually deaf cochlear implant users.

Alejandro Zuazua-Gonzalez, Miryam Calvino, Álvaro Postigo, Carlos Domingo, Javier Gavilán, Luis Lassaletta

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alejandro Zuazua-GonzalezDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain.
Miryam CalvinoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Universitario La Paz. IdiPAZ Research Institute. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Álvaro PostigoDepartment of Psychology, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.
Carlos DomingoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain.
Javier GavilánDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Universitario La Paz. IdiPAZ Research Institute. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Luis LassalettaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Universitario La Paz. IdiPAZ Research Institute. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. luis.lassaletta@uam.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8260-4523

Funding

Programa Estatal de Generación de Conocimiento y Fortalecimiento del Sistema Español de I + D + I, ISCiii, Spain PI21/00147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to translate and validate the "Music-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire" into Spanish (sMuRQoL) and assess its convergent validity and discriminative capacity by comparing its scores with the outcomes of the musical perception test Meludia.

methodsThe sMuRQoL was completed by 129 patients: 55 cochlear implant (CI) users and 74 normal hearing (NH) individuals. Conducted in this study were an exploratory factor analysis, an evaluation of internal consistency, an assessment of score stability through test-retest reliability, a comparison of sMuRQoL scores between CI users and NH individuals and an examination of potential evidence of convergent validity and discriminative capacity of sMuRQoL in relation to other tools. This involved the comparison of the questionnaire scores with the Meludia outcomes.

resultsThe sMuRQoL demonstrated a two-dimensional structure. All the dimensions displayed high internal consistency (α = 0.879-0.945) and score stability (ICC = 0.890-0.942). There were significant differences in the Frequency test between NH and CI users (d = 1.19-1.45). There's evidence of convergent validity between the scores of the Frequency test and the results of Meludia (r = 0.242-0.645). Additionally, the Frequency test demonstrate a good discriminative capacity to identify patients with poorer musical perception.

conclusionsThe sMuRQoL is a reliable questionnaire, with adequate evidence of validity based on internal structure. This study provides an accessible, cost-effective, and quick-to-administer instrument in Spanish, optimizing available healthcare resources and bringing us closer to the patient needs.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsDeafnessMusicQuality of LifeTranslationsAdultAgedCochlear ImplantationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesCochlear implantMeludiaMusicQuality of lifeQuestionnaireValidity

Identifiers

PMID38668790
PMCPMC11393212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.