Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38668776›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2024

Nanoparticle Polymeric Micellar Paclitaxel Versus Paclitaxel for Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer.

Fei-Yu Wang, Xiang-Ming Huang, Yu-Qing Cao, Jie Cao, Jie Ni, Ke Li, Min Lu, Xin-En Huang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fei-Yu WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University& Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, No. 42 Baiziting , Jiangsu, 210009, China.
Xiang-Ming HuangAffiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Yu-Qing CaoDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University& Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, No. 42 Baiziting , Jiangsu, 210009, China.
Jie CaoDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University& Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, No. 42 Baiziting , Jiangsu, 210009, China.
Jie NiDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University& Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, No. 42 Baiziting , Jiangsu, 210009, China.
Ke LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University& Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, No. 42 Baiziting , Jiangsu, 210009, China.
Min LuAffiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Xin-En HuangDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University& Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, No. 42 Baiziting , Jiangsu, 210009, China. huangxinen06@163.com.

Funding

Cadre Health Research Project of Jiangsu Province BJ21030General program of National Natural Science Foundation of China 82272671Medical Research Project of Jiangsu Commission of Health Z2022019Wu Jieping Fund 320.6750.2021-2-73
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNanoparticle polymeric micellar paclitaxel (NPMP) is a novel Cremophor EL (CrEL)-free nanoparticle micellar formulation of paclitaxel. This study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of NPMP in the treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

methodsPatients with histologically confirmed AGC in Jiangsu Cancer Hospital were retrospectively collected and divided into two groups. Patients in group A received NPMP at a total dose of 360 mg/m

resultsFrom January 2021 to May 2023, 63 patients (32 in group A and 31 in group B) could be evaluated for treatment response. A marked disparity in the overall response was observed between groups A and B, indicating statistical significance. The overall response rate was 31% in group A (10/32) and 10% in group B (3/31) (P = 0.034). Disease control rate was 91% in group A (29/32) and 81% in group B (25/31) (P = 0.440). No statistically significant difference in adverse reactions was observed between the two groups. However, the incidence of anemia, leucopenia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, liver dysfunction, and allergy in group A was notably lower than that in group B.

conclusionsNPMP combined chemotherapy offers a new, active, and safe treatment for patients with AGC.

Indexed as

MicellesNanoparticlesPaclitaxelStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleFluorouracilHumansLeucovorinMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicFluorouracilLeucovorinMicellesPaclitaxelChemotherapyGastric cancerNanoparticle polymeric micellar paclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID38668776
PMCPMC11347489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.