Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38668718›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2024

Implant Strength Contributes to the Osseointegration Strength of Porous Metallic Materials.

Elizabeth Mathey, Matthew H Pelletier, William R Walsh, Ken Gall, Dana Carpenter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizabeth MatheyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Denver, 1200 Larimer St, Denver, CO 80204.ORCID 0000-0002-6287-2053
Matthew H PelletierPrince of Wales Clinical School UNSW Sydney, Surgical and Orthopaedic Research Laboratories (SORL), Kensington 2031, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1643-6696
William R WalshPrince of Wales Clinical School UNSW Sydney, Surgical and Orthopaedic Research Laboratories (SORL), Kensington 2031, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5023-6148
Ken GallPratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.
Dana CarpenterDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO 80217-3364.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Creating the optimal environment for effective and long term osseointegration is a heavily researched and sought-after design criteria for orthopedic implants. A validated multimaterial finite element (FE) model was developed to replicate and understand the results of an experimental in vivo push-out osseointegration model. The FE model results closely predicted global force (at 0.5 mm) and stiffness for the 50-90% porous implants with an r2 of 0.97 and 0.98, respectively. In addition, the FE global force at 0.5 mm showed a correlation to the maximum experimental forces with an r2 of 0.90. The highest porosity implants (80-90%) showed lower stiffnesses and more equitable load sharing but also failed at lower a global force level than the low porosity implants (50-70%). The lower strength of the high porosity implants caused premature plastic deformation of the implant itself during loading as well as significant deformations in the ingrown and surrounding bone, resulting in lower overall osseointegration strength, consistent with experimental measurements. The lower porosity implants showed a balance of sufficient bony ingrowth to support osseointegration strength coupled with implant mechanical properties to circumvent significant implant plasticity and collapse under the loading conditions. Together, the experimental and finite element modeling results support an optimal porosity in the range of 60-70% for maximizing osseointegration with current structure and loading.

Indexed as

Finite Element AnalysisMaterials TestingOsseointegrationAnimalsMechanical PhenomenaMetalsPorosityProstheses and ImplantsStress, MechanicalMetalsfinite element modeling, osseointegration, gyroid, porous metallic material, bone implant assembly

Identifiers

PMID38668718
PMCPMC12501998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.