Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38668703›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology2024

Understanding changes in echocardiographic parameters at different ages following fetal growth restriction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mette van de Meent, Kirsten T Nijholt, Shary C A Joemmanbaks, Judith Kooiman, Henk S Schipper, Kimberley E Wever, A Titia Lely, Fieke Terstappen

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mette van de MeentDivision Women and Baby, Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3431-6591
Kirsten T NijholtDivision Women and Baby, Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Shary C A JoemmanbaksDivision Women and Baby, Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Judith KooimanDivision Women and Baby, Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Henk S SchipperDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Kimberley E WeverDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
A Titia LelyDivision Women and Baby, Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Fieke TerstappenDivision Women and Baby, Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6587-1320

Funding

University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU) Clinical Research Fellowship 2023ZonMw (Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development) 114024183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) increases cardiovascular risk by cardiac remodeling and programming. This systematic review and meta-analysis across species examines the use of echocardiography in FGR offspring at different ages. PubMed and Embase.com were searched for animal and human studies reporting on echocardiographic parameters in placental insufficiency-induced FGR offspring. We included six animal and 49 human studies. Although unable to perform a meta-analysis of animal studies because of insufficient number of studies per individual outcome, all studies showed left ventricular dysfunction. Our meta-analyses of human studies revealed a reduced left ventricular mass, interventricular septum thickness, mitral annular peak velocity, and mitral lateral early diastolic velocity at neonatal age. No echocardiographic differences during childhood were observed, although the small age range and number of studies limited these analyses. Only two studies at adult age were performed. Meta-regression on other influential factors was not possible due to underreporting. The few studies on myocardial strain analysis showed small changes in global longitudinal strain in FGR offspring. The quality of the human studies was considered low and the risk of bias in animal studies was mostly unclear. Echocardiography may offer a noninvasive tool to detect early signs of cardiovascular predisposition following FGR. Clinical implementation yet faces multiple challenges including identification of the most optimal timing and the exact relation to long-term cardiovascular function in which echocardiography alone might be limited to reflect a child's vascular status. Future research should focus on myocardial strain analysis and the combination of other (non)imaging techniques for an improved risk estimation.

Indexed as

Fetal Growth RetardationHeartAge FactorsAnimalsChildChild, PreschoolEchocardiographyFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePredictive Value of TestsPregnancyVentricular Function, Leftechocardiographyfetal growth restrictionmeta-analysissmall for gestational age

Identifiers

PMID38668703
PMCPMC11380958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.