SynthesisThe Journal of head trauma rehabilitation
Genetic Variants and Persistent Impairment Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Resting-State Brain Activity Changes and Their Genetic Correlates in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.Human brain mapping · 2025Pooled it
- Management and Prognosis of Patients with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Narrative Review.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Genetic factors complicating recovery in patients with brain injury: Possible link between injury severity and posttraumatic neurodegeneration related to intracerebral amyloid deposition - A narrative review.Surgical neurology international · 2026Review
- Traumatic brain injury reprograms lipid droplet metabolism shaped by aging and diet in Drosophila brain.PloS one · 2025Article
- Analyzing the Spectrum of mTBI Subgroups.Neurotrauma reportsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this review is to systematically assess primary research publications on known genetic variants, which modify the risk for symptoms or dysfunction persisting 30 days or more following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). SUMMARY OF REVIEW: A search of PubMed and Embase from inception through June 2022 identified 42 studies that associated genetic variants with the presence of symptoms or cognitive dysfunction 30 days or more following mTBI. Risk of bias was assessed for each publication using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS). Fifteen of the 22 studies evaluating apolipoprotein E ( APOE ) ɛ4 concluded that it was associated with worse outcomes and 4 of the 8 studies investigating the brain-derived neurotrophic factor ( BDNF ) reported the Val66Met allele was associated with poorer outcomes. The review also identified 12 studies associating 28 additional variants with mTBI outcomes. Of these, 8 references associated specific variants with poorer outcomes. Aside from analyses comparing carriers and noncarriers of APOE ɛ4 and BDNF Val66Met, most of the reviewed studies were too dissimilar, particularly in terms of specific outcome measures but also in genes examined, to allow for direct comparisons of their findings. Moreover, these investigations were observational and subject to varying degrees of bias.
conclusionsThe most consistent finding across articles was that APOE ɛ4 is associated with persistent post-mTBI impairment (symptoms or cognitive dysfunction) more than 30 days after mTBI. The sparsity of other well-established and consistent findings in the mTBI literature should motivate larger, prospective studies, which characterize the risk for persistent impairment with standardized outcomes in mTBI posed by other genetic variants influencing mTBI recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.