Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38668493›Full record

ArticleToxics2024

The Comet Assay as a Tool in Human Biomonitoring Studies of Environmental and Occupational Exposure to Chemicals-A Systematic Scoping Review.

Carina Ladeira, Peter Møller, Lisa Giovannelli, Goran Gajski, Anja Haveric, Ezgi Eyluel Bankoglu, Amaya Azqueta, Marko Gerić, Helga Stopper, José Cabêda and 2 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Toxics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Alkaline Comet Assay for Assessment of DNA Damage.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  11. Application of the Comet Assay in Advanced In Vitro Models.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Molecular Impacts of Occupational Exposure to Waste Anesthetic Gases.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Carina LadeiraH&TRC-Health & Technology Research Center, ESTeSL-Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, 1990-096 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5588-0074
Peter MøllerDepartment of Public Health, Section of Environmental Health, University of Copenhagen, 1172 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2021-1249
Lisa GiovannelliDepartment NEUROFARBA, Section Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4027-4693
Goran GajskiDivision of Toxicology, Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-1886-1453
Anja HavericInstitute for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Sarajevo, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.ORCID 0000-0002-2398-3535
Ezgi Eyluel BankogluInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Würzburg, 97078 Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7488-6228
Amaya AzquetaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Navarra, 31009 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4857-9931
Marko GerićDivision of Toxicology, Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-5886-4106
Helga StopperInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Würzburg, 97078 Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4168-8211
José CabêdaGuarda Nacional Republicana, Destacamento Territorial de Vila Franca de Xira, Núcleo de Proteção Ambiental, 1500-124 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0009-0009-3552-7711
Fernanda S ToninPharmaceutical Care Research Group, Universidad de Granada, 18012 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4262-8608
Andrew CollinsDepartment of Nutrition, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5916-6871

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomonitoring of human populations exposed to chemical substances that can act as potential mutagens or carcinogens, may enable the detection of damage and early disease prevention. In recent years, the comet assay has become an important tool for assessing DNA damage, both in environmental and occupational exposure contexts. To evidence the role of the comet assay in human biomonitoring, we have analysed original research studies of environmental or occupational exposure that used the comet assay in their assessments, following the PRISMA-ScR method (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews). Groups of chemicals were designated according to a broad classification, and the results obtained from over 300 original studies (n = 123 on air pollutants, n = 14 on anaesthetics, n = 18 on antineoplastic drugs, n = 57 on heavy metals, n = 59 on pesticides, and n = 49 on solvents) showed overall higher values of DNA strand breaks in the exposed subjects in comparison with the unexposed. In summary, our systematic scoping review strengthens the relevance of the use of the comet assay in assessing DNA damage in human biomonitoring studies.

Indexed as

air pollutionanaestheticsantineoplastic drugscomet assayexposureheavy metalshuman biomonitoringpesticidessolvents

Identifiers

PMID38668493
PMCPMC11054096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.