Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38668396›Full record

ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2024

Test-Retest Reproducibility of Reduced-Field-of-View Density-Weighted CRT MRSI at 3T.

Nicholas Farley, Antonia Susnjar, Mark Chiew, Uzay E Emir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicholas FarleySchool of Health Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Antonia SusnjarWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Mark ChiewDepartment of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1L7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6272-8783
Uzay E EmirSchool of Health Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5376-0431

Funding

Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUM1TR004402 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Sharon M Moe, Sarah Elizabeth Wiehe · 2023 to 2026
$21.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004402Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 223131/Z/21/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantifying an imaging modality's ability to reproduce results is important for establishing its utility. In magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI), new acquisition protocols are regularly introduced which improve upon their precursors with respect to signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), total acquisition duration, and nominal voxel resolution. This study has quantified the within-subject and between-subject reproducibility of one such new protocol (reduced-field-of-view density-weighted concentric ring trajectory (rFOV-DW-CRT) MRSI) by calculating the coefficient of variance of data acquired from a test-retest experiment. The posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and the right superior corona radiata (SCR) were selected as the regions of interest (ROIs) for grey matter (GM) and white matter (WM), respectively. CVs for between-subject and within-subject were consistently around or below 15% for Glx, tCho, and Myo-Ins, and below 5% for tNAA and tCr.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultBrainFemaleGray MatterHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMaleReproducibility of ResultsSignal-To-Noise RatioWhite MatterYoung Adultimagingmagneticnon-Cartesiannuclearreproducibilityresonancespectroscopytest–retest

Identifiers

PMID38668396
PMCPMC11055142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.