Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38668251›Full record

ReviewPathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2024

African Swine Fever Diagnosis in Africa: Challenges and Opportunities.

Mary-Louise Penrith, Juanita van Emmenes, Jean N Hakizimana, Livio Heath, Tonny Kabuuka, Gerald Misinzo, Theophilus Odoom, Abel Wade, Habibata L Zerbo, Pam D Luka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mary-Louise PenrithDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, Pretoria 0110, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-6924-4060
Juanita van EmmenesTransboundary Animal Diseases, Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute, Agricultural Research Council, Pretoria 0110, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-3048-315X
Jean N HakizimanaSACIDS Africa Centre of Excellence for Infectious Diseases, SACIDS Foundation for One Health, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro P.O. Box 3297, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-5911-5115
Livio HeathTransboundary Animal Diseases, Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute, Agricultural Research Council, Pretoria 0110, South Africa.
Tonny KabuukaNational Livestock Resources Research Institute, National Agricultural Research Organization, Entebbe P.O. Box 295, Uganda.
Gerald MisinzoSACIDS Africa Centre of Excellence for Infectious Diseases, SACIDS Foundation for One Health, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro P.O. Box 3297, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0003-1827-6403
Theophilus OdoomVeterinary Services Directorate, Accra Veterinary Laboratory, Accra P.O. Box M161, Ghana.
Abel WadeNational Veterinary Laboratory (LANAVET), Garoua P.O. Box 503, Cameroon.
Habibata L ZerboMinistry of Agriculture, Animal and Fisheries Resources, Ouagadougou 03 BP 907, Burkina Faso.
Pam D LukaBiotechnology Centre, National Veterinary Research Institute, PMB 1, Vom 930103, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-6170-4242

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global spread of African swine fever (ASF) in recent decades has led to the need for technological advances in sampling and diagnostic techniques. The impetus for these has been the need to enable sampling by lay persons and to obtain at least a preliminary diagnosis in the field for early control measures to be put in place before final laboratory confirmation. In rural Africa, rapid diagnosis is hampered by challenges that include lack of infrastructure as well as human and financial resources. Lack of animal health personnel, access to affordable means to transport field samples to a laboratory, and lack of laboratories with the capacity to make the diagnosis result in severe under-reporting of ASF, especially in endemic areas. This review summarizes the challenges identified in gap analyses relevant to low- and middle-income countries, with a focus on Africa, and explore the opportunities provided by recent research to improve field diagnosis and quality of diagnostic samples used. Sampling techniques include invasive sampling techniques requiring trained personnel and non-invasive sampling requiring minimal training, sampling of decomposed carcass material, and preservation of samples in situations where cold chain maintenance cannot be guaranteed. Availability and efficacy of point-of-care (POC) tests for ASF has improved considerably in recent years and their application, as well as advantages and limitations, are discussed. The adequacy of existing laboratory diagnostic capacity is evaluated and opportunities for networking amongst reference and other laboratories offering diagnostic services are discussed. Maintaining laboratory diagnostic efficiency in the absence of samples during periods of quiescence is another issue that requires attention, and the role of improved laboratory networking is emphasized. Early diagnosis of ASF is key to managing the disease spread. Therefore, the establishment of the Africa Chapter of the Global African Swine Fever Research Alliance (GARA) increases opportunities for collaboration and networking among the veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the region.

Indexed as

African Swine FeverAfricaAfrican Swine Fever VirusAnimalsHumansSpecimen HandlingSwineAfrican swine fevernetworksregional collaborationveterinary diagnostic laboratories

Identifiers

PMID38668251
PMCPMC11054189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.