Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38667593›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Development of a Conversion Table Linking Functional Independence Measure Scores to International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Qualifiers: Insights from a Survey of Healthcare Professionals.

Shu Umemori, Mao Ogawa, Shin Yamada, Masayo Komatsu, Emiko Oikawa, Yasuyo Okamoto, Masaki Katoh, Tomohide Shirasaka, Kagari Abiko, Shigehiro Moriizumi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shu UmemoriDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan.
Mao OgawaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1690-5141
Shin YamadaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Mitaka 181-8611, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3061-0267
Masayo KomatsuDivision of Environmental Medicine and Population Sciences, Department of Social Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita 565-0871, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4861-4717
Emiko OikawaGeneral Incorporated Association, Japan ICF Association, Tama 206-0012, Japan.
Yasuyo OkamotoDepartment of Rehabilitation, Hanakawa Hospital, Ishikari 061-3207, Japan.
Masaki KatohDepartment of Rehabilitation, Fujita Health University Hospital, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan.
Tomohide ShirasakaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hokuto Social Medical Corporation Tokachi Rehabilitation Center, Obihiro 080-0833, Japan.
Kagari AbikoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sapporo Azabu Neurosurgical Hospital, Sapporo 065-0022, Japan.
Shigehiro MoriizumiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Moriyama Memorial Hospital, Asahikawa 070-0832, Japan.
Yuichiro MatsuoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Medical Center, Sapporo 063-0005, Japan.
Harukazu TohyamaFaculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0317-8088
Masahiko MukainoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan.

Funding

Grants for Research on Health and Welfare 20AB1003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In clinical practice, patient assessments rely on established scales. Integrating data from these scales into the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework has been suggested; however, a standardized approach is lacking. Herein, we tested a new approach to develop a conversion table translating clinical scale scores into ICF qualifiers based on a clinician survey. The survey queried rehabilitation professionals about which functional independence measure (FIM) item scores (1-7) corresponded to the ICF qualifiers (0-4). A total of 458 rehabilitation professionals participated. The survey findings indicated a general consensus on the equivalence of FIM scores with ICF qualifiers. The median value for each item remained consistent across all item groups. Specifically, FIM 1 had a median value of 4; FIM 2 and 3 both had median values of 3; FIM 4 and 5 both had median values of 2; FIM 6 had a median value of 1; and FIM 7 had a median value of 0. Despite limitations due to the irreconcilable differences between the frameworks of existing scales and the ICF, these results underline the ICF's potential to serve as a central hub for integrating clinical data from various scales.

Indexed as

functioningICFqualifiers

Identifiers

PMID38667593
PMCPMC11049898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.