ReviewDiseases (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Impact of Systemic Treatments on Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients with RAS-Positive Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Review in Diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhanced Recovery Pathway and Postoperative Ileus After Elective Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- How Digital Stress and eHealth Literacy Relate to Missed Nursing Care and Willingness to Use AI Decision Support.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Orthodontic Appliance Type and Oral Malodor Burden: Cross-Sectional Comparison of Clear Aligners, Fixed Braces, and Untreated Controls.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Care Settings, Autonomy, and Costs in Severe Mental Illness: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Hospital, Residential, and Community Care in Romania.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparison of patient-reported outcomes and healthcare utilization between metastatic colorectal cancer patients receiving systemic therapy with or without concurrent palliative care support: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Metabolic Multimorbidity and Acute Obstructive Presentation in Colon Cancer: A 677-Patient Hospital-Based Cohort.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Predictors of impaired quality of life among colorectal cancer survivors: a cross-sectional study.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2025Article
- Assessment of the quality of life in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with KRAS gene mutant: a case-control study.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Extracellular vesicle-mediated chemoresistance in breast cancer: focus on miRNA cargo.Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids · 2025Review
- Identification of Specific Plasma miRNAs as Potential Biomarkers for Major Depressive Disorder.Biomedicines · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review critically evaluates the impact of systemic treatments on outcomes and quality of life (QoL) in patients with RAS-positive stage IV colorectal cancer, with studies published up to December 2023 across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. From an initial pool of 1345 articles, 11 relevant studies were selected for inclusion, encompassing a diverse range of systemic treatments, including panitumumab combined with FOLFOX4 and FOLFIRI, irinotecan paired with panitumumab, regorafenib followed by cetuximab ± irinotecan and vice versa, and panitumumab as a maintenance therapy post-induction. Patient demographics predominantly included middle-aged to elderly individuals, with a slight male predominance. Racial composition, where reported, showed a majority of Caucasian participants, highlighting the need for broader demographic inclusivity in future research. Key findings revealed that the addition of panitumumab to chemotherapy (FOLFOX4 or FOLFIRI) did not significantly compromise QoL while notably improving disease-free survival, with baseline EQ-5D HSI mean scores ranging from 0.76 to 0.78 and VAS mean scores from 70.1 to 74.1. Improvements in FACT-C scores and EQ-5D Index scores particularly favored panitumumab plus best supportive care in KRAS wild-type mCRC, with early dropout rates of 38-42% for panitumumab + BSC. Notably, cetuximab + FOLFIRI was associated with a median survival of 25.7 months versus 16.4 months for FOLFIRI alone, emphasizing the potential benefits of integrating targeted therapies with chemotherapy. In conclusion, the review underscores the significant impact of systemic treatments, particularly targeted therapies and their combinations with chemotherapy, on survival outcomes and QoL in patients with RAS-positive stage IV colorectal cancer, and the need for personalized treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.