ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Optimizing Precision: A Trajectory Tract Reference Approach to Minimize Complications in CT-Guided Transthoracic Core Biopsy.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Explainable Transformer-Based Framework for Lung Cancer Classification and Automated Radiology Report Generation from Multi-Slice CT Images.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Reducing Lung Biopsy Complications with Saline Injection: Evidence from a CT-Guided Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Impact of Technical Standardization on Pneumothorax and Chest Tube Insertion Rates: A Retrospective Learning Curve Analysis of CT-Guided Lung Biopsies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Comparison of laser-guided technology and conventional manual percutaneous lung biopsy: a single-center retrospective study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The advent of computed tomography (CT)-guided transthoracic needle biopsy has significantly advanced the diagnosis of lung lesions, offering a minimally invasive approach to obtaining tissue samples. However, the technique is not without risks, including pneumothorax and hemorrhage, and it demands high precision to ensure diagnostic accuracy while minimizing complications. This study introduces the Laser Angle Guide Assembly (LAGA), a novel device designed to enhance the accuracy and safety of CT-guided lung biopsies. We retrospectively analyzed 322 CT-guided lung biopsy cases performed with LAGA at a single center over seven years, aiming to evaluate its effectiveness in improving diagnostic yield and reducing procedural risks. The study achieved a diagnostic success rate of 94.3%, with a significant reduction in the need for multiple needle passes, demonstrating a majority of biopsies successfully completed with a single pass. The incidence of pneumothorax stood at 11.1%, which is markedly lower than the reported averages, and only 0.3% of cases necessitated chest tube placement, underscoring the safety benefits of the LAGA system. These findings underscore the potential of LAGA to revolutionize CT-guided lung biopsies by enhancing procedural precision and safety, making it a valuable addition to the diagnostic arsenal against pulmonary lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.