Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38667227›Full record

ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Comparing Business, Innovation, and Platform Ecosystems: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Zhe Liu, Zichen Li, Yudong Zhang, Anthony N Mutukumira, Yichen Feng, Yangjie Cui, Shuzhe Wang, Jiaji Wang, Shuihua Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zhe LiuSchool of Management, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0934-4438
Zichen LiSchool of Management, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Yudong ZhangSchool of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4870-1493
Anthony N MutukumiraSchool of Food and Advanced Technology, Massey University, Auckland 0745, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3189-2120
Yichen FengSchool of Management, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Yangjie CuiSchool of Management, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Shuzhe WangSchool of Management, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Jiaji WangSchool of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0745-9386
Shuihua WangSchool of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.

Funding

British Heart Foundation AA/18/3/34220
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent decades, the term "ecosystem" has garnered substantial attention in scholarly and managerial discourse, featuring prominently in academic and applied contexts. While individual scholars have made significant contributions to the study of various types of ecosystem, there appears to be a research gap marked by a lack of comprehensive synthesis and refinement of findings across diverse ecosystems. This paper systematically addresses this gap through a hybrid methodology, employing bibliometric and content analyses to systematically review the literature from 1993 to 2023. The primary research aim is to critically examine theoretical studies on different ecosystem types, specifically focusing on business, innovation, and platform ecosystems. The methodology of this study involves a content review of the identified literature, combining quantitative bibliometric analyses to differentiate patterns and content analysis for in-depth exploration. The core findings center on refining and summarizing the definitions of business, innovation, and platform ecosystems, shedding light on both commonalities and distinctions. Notably, the research unveils shared characteristics such as openness and diversity across these ecosystems while highlighting significant differences in terms of participants and objectives. Furthermore, the paper delves into the interconnections within these three ecosystem types, offering insights into their dynamics and paving the way for discussions on future research directions. This comprehensive examination not only advances our understanding of business, innovation, and platform ecosystems but also lays the groundwork for future scholarly inquiries in this dynamic and evolving field.

Indexed as

business ecosystemecosysteminnovation ecosystemliterature reviewplatform ecosystem

Identifiers

PMID38667227
PMCPMC11048555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.