ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Dynamic Random Walk and Dynamic Opposition Learning for Improving Aquila Optimizer: Solving Constrained Engineering Design Problems.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-Strategy Improved Aquila Optimizer with Adaptive Exploration and Individual-Level Stagnation Control: A Bio-Inspired Hybrid Metaheuristic and Its Engineering Applications.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
One of the most important tasks in handling real-world global optimization problems is to achieve a balance between exploration and exploitation in any nature-inspired optimization method. As a result, the search agents of an algorithm constantly strive to investigate the unexplored regions of a search space. Aquila Optimizer (AO) is a recent addition to the field of metaheuristics that finds the solution to an optimization problem using the hunting behavior of Aquila. However, in some cases, AO skips the true solutions and is trapped at sub-optimal solutions. These problems lead to premature convergence (stagnation), which is harmful in determining the global optima. Therefore, to solve the above-mentioned problem, the present study aims to establish comparatively better synergy between exploration and exploitation and to escape from local stagnation in AO. In this direction, firstly, the exploration ability of AO is improved by integrating Dynamic Random Walk (DRW), and, secondly, the balance between exploration and exploitation is maintained through Dynamic Oppositional Learning (DOL). Due to its dynamic search space and low complexity, the DOL-inspired DRW technique is more computationally efficient and has higher exploration potential for convergence to the best optimum. This allows the algorithm to be improved even further and prevents premature convergence. The proposed algorithm is named DAO. A well-known set of CEC2017 and CEC2019 benchmark functions as well as three engineering problems are used for the performance evaluation. The superior ability of the proposed DAO is demonstrated by the examination of the numerical data produced and its comparison with existing metaheuristic algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.