Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38667206›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Design and Assessment of Bird-Inspired 3D-Printed Models to Evaluate Grasp Mechanics.

Pavan Senthil, Om Vishanagra, John Sparkman, Peter Smith, Albert Manero

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pavan SenthilLimbitless Solutions, University of Central Florida, 12703 Research Parkway, Suite 100, Orlando, FL 32826, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4036-0954
Om VishanagraLimbitless Solutions, University of Central Florida, 12703 Research Parkway, Suite 100, Orlando, FL 32826, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-8036-2051
John SparkmanLimbitless Solutions, University of Central Florida, 12703 Research Parkway, Suite 100, Orlando, FL 32826, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9346-5947
Peter SmithLimbitless Solutions, University of Central Florida, 12703 Research Parkway, Suite 100, Orlando, FL 32826, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4487-0441
Albert ManeroLimbitless Solutions, University of Central Florida, 12703 Research Parkway, Suite 100, Orlando, FL 32826, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0145-7582
University of Central Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adapting grasp-specialized biomechanical structures into current research with 3D-printed prostheses may improve robotic dexterity in grasping a wider variety of objects. Claw variations across various bird species lend biomechanical advantages for grasping motions related to perching, climbing, and hunting. Designs inspired by bird claws provide improvements beyond a human-inspired structure for specific grasping applications to offer a solution for mitigating a cause of the high rejection rate for upper-limb prostheses. This research focuses on the design and manufacturing of two robotic test devices with different toe arrangements. The first, anisodactyl (three toes at the front, one at the back), is commonly found in birds of prey such as falcons and hawks. The second, zygodactyl (two toes at the front, two at the back), is commonly found in climbing birds such as woodpeckers and parrots. The evaluation methods for these models included a qualitative variable-object grasp assessment. The results highlighted design features that suggest an improved grasp: a small and central palm, curved distal digit components, and a symmetrical digit arrangement. A quantitative grip force test demonstrated that the single digit, the anisodactyl claw, and the zygodactyl claw designs support loads up to 64.3 N, 86.1 N, and 74.1 N, respectively. These loads exceed the minimum mechanical load capabilities for prosthetic devices. The developed designs offer insights into how biomimicry can be harnessed to optimize the grasping functionality of upper-limb prostheses.

Indexed as

3D printingbiomimicryprostheses

Identifiers

PMID38667206
PMCPMC11048456
OpenAlexW4393201176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.