Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38667197›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2024

Optimizing Microfluidic Impedance Cytometry by Bypass Electrode Layout Design.

Guangzu Wu, Zhiwei Zhang, Manman Du, Dan Wu, Junting Zhou, Tianteng Hao, Xinwu Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Guangzu WuSystems Engineering Institute, Academy of Military Sciences, People's Liberation Army, Tianjin 300161, China.
Zhiwei ZhangSystems Engineering Institute, Academy of Military Sciences, People's Liberation Army, Tianjin 300161, China.
Manman DuSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.
Dan WuSchool of Electronic Information and Automation, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin 300222, China.
Junting ZhouSchool of Electronic Information and Automation, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin 300222, China.
Tianteng HaoSchool of Electronic Information and Automation, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin 300222, China.
Xinwu XieSystems Engineering Institute, Academy of Military Sciences, People's Liberation Army, Tianjin 300161, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6446-4045

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microfluidic impedance cytometry (MIC) has emerged as a popular technique for single-cell analysis. Traditional MIC electrode designs consist of a pair of (or three) working electrodes, and their detection performance needs further improvements for microorganisms. In this study, we designed an 8-electrode MIC device in which the center pair was defined as the working electrode, and the connection status of bypass electrodes could be changed. This allowed us to compare the performance of layouts with no bypasses and those with floating or grounding electrodes by simulation and experiment. The results of detecting Φ 5 μm beads revealed that both the grounding and the floating electrode outperformed the no bypass electrode, and the grounding electrode demonstrated the best signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), coefficient of variation (CV), and detection sensitivity. Furthermore, the effects of different bypass grounding areas (numbers of grounding electrodes) were investigated. Finally, particles passing at high horizontal positions can be detected, and Φ 1 μm beads can be measured in a wide channel (150 μm) using a fully grounding electrode, with the sensitivity of bead volume detection reaching 0.00097%. This provides a general MIC electrode optimization technology for detecting smaller particles, even macromolecular proteins, viruses, and exosomes in the future.

Indexed as

Electric ImpedanceElectrodesBiosensing TechniquesEquipment DesignFlow CytometryMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesMicrofluidicsSignal-To-Noise Ratiofloating electrodegrounding electrodemicrofluidic impedance cytometryno bypass electrodesensing sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID38667197
PMCPMC11048680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.