Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38667071›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2024

The Impact of Motherhood on Women's Career Progression: A Scoping Review of Evidence-Based Interventions.

Ana Júlia Calegari Torres, Letícia Barbosa-Silva, Ligia Carolina Oliveira-Silva, Olívia Pillar Perez Miziara, Ully Carolina Rodrigues Guahy, Alexandra N Fisher, Michelle K Ryan

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Von Willebrand disease: more than just a bleeding disorder.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Exploring Gender Differences: Training, Practice, and Family Dynamics Among Fellowship-Trained Neurotologists.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ana Júlia Calegari TorresInstitute of Psychology, Federal University of Uberlândia, Av. Pará, 1720-Bloco 2C, Av. Maranhão, s/n-Campus Umuarama, Uberlândia 38405-240, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0009-8088-6190
Letícia Barbosa-SilvaInstitute of Psychology, Federal University of Uberlândia, Av. Pará, 1720-Bloco 2C, Av. Maranhão, s/n-Campus Umuarama, Uberlândia 38405-240, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1742-9618
Ligia Carolina Oliveira-SilvaInstitute of Psychology, Federal University of Uberlândia, Av. Pará, 1720-Bloco 2C, Av. Maranhão, s/n-Campus Umuarama, Uberlândia 38405-240, MG, Brazil.
Olívia Pillar Perez MiziaraInstitute of Psychology, Federal University of Uberlândia, Av. Pará, 1720-Bloco 2C, Av. Maranhão, s/n-Campus Umuarama, Uberlândia 38405-240, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5413-9484
Ully Carolina Rodrigues GuahyInstitute of Psychology, University of São Paulo, Av. Professor Mello Moraes, 1721-Butantã, São Paulo 05508-030, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0008-1814-1326
Alexandra N FisherThe Global Institute for Women's Leadership, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3892-034X
Michelle K RyanThe Global Institute for Women's Leadership, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.

Funding

National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 406604/2021-5 and 401131/2022-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Despite the progress made by women in the workplace, mothers still face systemic barriers that prevent them from advancing professionally. This "motherhood penalty" involves a variety of discriminatory practices and experiences that mothers can face at work, including being held to stricter standards regarding salary and recruitment. Despite ongoing research on the association between motherhood and career outcomes, few studies specifically explore how motherhood impacts career advancement and, consequently, access to leadership. This scoping review seeks to gain an understanding of how motherhood impacts women's career progression, and how interventions can address the underrepresentation of mothers in leadership. (2) Methods: Following the PRISMA-ScR framework, we analyzed 52 articles from 2010 to 2022, drawn from 10 databases. (3) Results: The results showed both negative and positive impacts of motherhood on career progression, affecting mothers' attitudes, feelings, and behaviors and yielding changes in interpersonal relationships and work conditions. Intersectionality is highlighted, urging a nuanced examination of challenges faced by mothers from a diversity of backgrounds. Recommendations for interventions include individual and institutional efforts, comprising societal support structures, organizational policy changes, and cultural shifts. (4) Conclusions: This scoping review offers an updated perspective on a classic challenge, providing practical insights for a more inclusive and structural understanding of the career trajectories of working mothers.

Indexed as

careerinterventionsleadershipmotherhoodprogressionreview

Identifiers

PMID38667071
PMCPMC11047346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.