Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38666936›Full record

ArticleCurrent issues in molecular biology2024

Plasticity of Response Properties of Mouse Visual Cortex Neurons Induced by Optogenetic Tetanization In Vivo.

Ivan V Smirnov, Aksiniya A Osipova, Maria P Smirnova, Anastasia A Borodinova, Maxim A Volgushev, Alexey Y Malyshev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current issues in molecular biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ivan V SmirnovInstitute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of RAS, Moscow 117485, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6192-7008
Aksiniya A OsipovaInstitute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of RAS, Moscow 117485, Russia.
Maria P SmirnovaInstitute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of RAS, Moscow 117485, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6668-958X
Anastasia A BorodinovaInstitute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of RAS, Moscow 117485, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0020-5263
Maxim A VolgushevDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
Alexey Y MalyshevInstitute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of RAS, Moscow 117485, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4633-7691

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 20-15-00398P
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heterosynaptic plasticity, along with Hebbian homosynaptic plasticity, is an important mechanism ensuring the stable operation of learning neuronal networks. However, whether heterosynaptic plasticity occurs in the whole brain in vivo, and what role(s) in brain function in vivo it could play, remains unclear. Here, we used an optogenetics approach to apply a model of intracellular tetanization, which was established and employed to study heterosynaptic plasticity in brain slices, to study the plasticity of response properties of neurons in the mouse visual cortex in vivo. We show that optogenetically evoked high-frequency bursts of action potentials (optogenetic tetanization) in the principal neurons of the visual cortex induce long-term changes in the responses to visual stimuli. Optogenetic tetanization had distinct effects on responses to different stimuli, as follows: responses to optimal and orthogonal orientations decreased, responses to null direction did not change, and responses to oblique orientations increased. As a result, direction selectivity of the neurons decreased and orientation tuning became broader. Since optogenetic tetanization was a postsynaptic protocol, applied in the absence of sensory stimulation, and, thus, without association of presynaptic activity with bursts of action potentials, the observed changes were mediated by mechanisms of heterosynaptic plasticity. We conclude that heterosynaptic plasticity can be induced in vivo and propose that it may play important homeostatic roles in operation of neural networks by helping to prevent runaway dynamics of responses to visual stimuli and to keep the tuning of neuronal responses within the range optimized for the encoding of multiple features in population activity.

Indexed as

heterosynaptic plasticityin vivomiceneuronoptogeneticsvisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID38666936
PMCPMC11049003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.