ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2024
Topological Perturbations in the Functional Connectome Support the Deficit/Non-deficit Distinction in Antipsychotic Medication-Naïve First Episode Psychosis Patients.
Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cognitive subtypes and brain network differences in antipsychotic-naïve first-episode psychosis.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Memory and learning impairments in deficit and non-deficit schizophrenia: a scoping review.Postepy psychiatrii neurologii · 2026Review
- Default Mode Network, Disorganization, and Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2026Article
- Resting-state EEG markers associated with violence risk in patients with major depressive disorder.Psychological medicine · 2026Article
- A Systematic Review of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Literature Investigating the Deficit Syndrome in Schizophrenia.Schizophrenia bulletin open · 2026Article
- Deep Learning for Epileptic Seizure Detection Using a Causal-Spatio-Temporal Model Based on Transfer Entropy.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHeterogeneity in the etiology, pathophysiology, and clinical features of schizophrenia challenges clinicians and researchers. A helpful approach could be stratifying patients according to the presence or absence of clinical features of the deficit syndrome (DS). DS is characterized by enduring and primary negative symptoms, a clinically less heterogeneous subtype of the illness, and patients with features of DS are thought to present abnormal brain network characteristics, however, this idea has received limited attention. We investigated functional brain network topology in patients displaying deficit features and those who do not.
designWe applied graph theory analytics to resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data of 61 antipsychotic medication-naïve first episode psychosis patients, 18 DS and 43 non-deficit schizophrenia (NDS), and 72 healthy controls (HC). We quantified small-worldness, global and nodal efficiency measures, shortest path length, nodal local efficiency, and synchronization and contrasted them among the 3 groups.
resultsDS presented decreased network integration and segregation compared to HC and NDS. DS showed lower global efficiency, longer global path lengths, and lower global local efficiency. Nodal efficiency was lower and the shortest path length was longer in DS in default mode, ventral attention, dorsal attention, frontoparietal, limbic, somatomotor, and visual networks compared to HC. Compared to NDS, DS showed lower efficiency and longer shortest path length in default mode, limbic, somatomotor, and visual networks.
conclusionsOur data supports increasing evidence, based on topological perturbations of the functional connectome, that deficit syndrome may be a distinct form of the illness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.