Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38666634›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols2024

Mouse Surgical Model of Mechanical Uterine Injury and Subsequent Embryo Defects.

Elisa T Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elisa T ZhangDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1294-2372
Stanford University · US

Funding

Molecular images and machine learning to extract placental function from maternal cfDNAR01HD094513 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BAKER, JULIE C, KUNDAJE, ANSHUL · 2018 to 2022
$3.1M
NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD091946NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD094513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uterine injury from procedures such as Cesarean sections (C-sections) often have severe consequences on subsequent pregnancies, leading to disorders such as uterine placenta previa, placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), and Cesarean scar pregnancy. With rates of C-section at ∼30% of deliveries in the US and projected to continue to climb, an understanding of the mechanisms by which these pregnancy disorders arise and opportunities for intervention are sorely needed. However, there are currently very few animal models of uterine injury and its subsequent impacts on maternal as well as in utero and postnatal fetal outcomes. Here, we describe a procedure for a novel model of surgically induced uterine injury in the genetically tractable laboratory mouse (Mus musculus). We describe preparatory steps for surgery, the induction of uterine injury itself, and post-surgical recovery. We then provide supporting information regarding downstream dissection of pregnant mice. Lastly, we include additional information regarding estrous cycle staging in order to perform surgeries and dissections at the relevant phase in non-pregnant mice. This procedure for incurring uterine injury in a mouse model presents an important step forward in understanding uterine damage and its associated pregnancy disorders. © 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Preparation for surgery Basic Protocol 2: Surgery and induction of uterine injury Basic Protocol 3: Mating and dissection of pregnant mice as endpoint analyses Support Protocol: Estrous staging of animals.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalUterusAnimalsCesarean SectionFemaleMicePregnancymouse surgeryplacentareproductive outcomesuterine injuryuteruswound healing

Identifiers

PMID38666634
PMCPMC11081439
OpenAlexW4395677655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.