Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38666626›Full record

ReviewCurrent protocols2024

Approaches for Mapping and Analysis of R-loops.

Pramiti Mukhopadhyay, Henry Miller, Aiola Stoja, Alexander J R Bishop

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genome-Wide Mapping of R-Loops in S. cerevisiae by H-CRAC.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pramiti MukhopadhyayGreehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
Henry MillerAltos Labs, Redwood City, California.
Aiola StojaGreehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
Alexander J R BishopGreehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5742-4387

Funding

Dysregulated transcription processes in Ewing sarcoma:R01CA241554 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI BISHOP, ALEXANDER JAMES · 2020 to 2025
$2.3M
Improving etoposide treatment of Ewing's sarcomaR01CA152063 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI BISHOP, ALEXANDER JAMES · 2011 to 2015
$1.5M
The dynamics and impact of R-loops in epigenetic stability and agingF31AG072902 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI MILLER, HENRY · 2021 to 2022
$41k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA152063NCI NIH HHS R01 CA241554NIA NIH HHS F31 AG072902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

R-loops are nucleic acid structures composed of a DNA:RNA hybrid with a displaced non-template single-stranded DNA. Current approaches to identify and map R-loop formation across the genome employ either an antibody targeted against R-loops (S9.6) or a catalytically inactivated form of RNase H1 (dRNH1), a nuclease that can bind and resolve DNA:RNA hybrids via RNA exonuclease activity. This overview article outlines several ways to map R-loops using either methodology, explaining the differences and similarities among the approaches. Bioinformatic analysis of R-loops involves several layers of quality control and processing before visualizing the data. This article provides resources and tools that can be used to accurately process R-loop mapping data and explains the advantages and disadvantages of the resources as compared to one another. © 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Indexed as

Ribonuclease HR-Loop StructuresComputational BiologyDNAHumansRNADNARibonuclease Hribonuclease HIRNAbioinformaticsR‐loopsRNase H1S9.6sequencing

Identifiers

PMID38666626
PMCPMC11840513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.