ReviewBiochemical Society transactions2024
From bottom-up to cell surface proteomics: detergents or no detergents, that is the question.
Review in Biochemical Society transactions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular characterization of the uterotrophic assay: temporal gene expression changes in uterus and pituitary gland following ethinylestradiol.Archives of toxicology · 2026Article
- PEPTERGENT: A Peptide-Based Reagent for Detergent-Free Extraction of Membrane Proteins and Purification of Membrane Proteomes.Bio-protocol · 2026Article
- Article
- Expanding the Reach of Membrane Protein-Ligand Interaction Studies Through the Integration of Mass Spectrometry and Membrane Mimetics.Proteomics · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- Sensitive Profiling of Mouse Liver Membrane Proteome Dysregulation Following a High-Fat and Alcohol Diet Treatment.Proteomics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Measuring the expression levels of membrane proteins (MPs) is crucial for understanding cell differentiation and tissue specificity, defining disease characteristics, identifying biomarkers, and developing therapeutics. While bottom-up proteomics addresses the need for accurately surveying the membrane proteome, the lower abundance and hydrophobic nature of MPs pose challenges in sample preparation. As MPs normally reside in the lipid bilayer, conventional extraction methods rely on detergents, introducing here a paradox - detergents prevent aggregation and facilitate protein processing, but themselves become contaminants that interfere with downstream analytical applications. Various detergent removal methods exist to mitigate this issue, including filter-aided sample preparation, SP3, suspension trapping, and membrane mimetics. This review delves into the fundamentals of each strategy, applications, merits, and limitations, providing insights into their effectiveness in MP research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.