Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38666560›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2025

Understanding the psychological impact of identifying carrier status on young adults: A qualitative study exploring peer reactions.

Edie Bowen, John Langston, Harriet Fletcher, Julia Domek, Fiona Ulph

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Edie BowenManchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
John LangstonManchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Harriet FletcherManchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Julia DomekManchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Fiona UlphManchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3590-6542

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The benefits and harms of identifying carriers in childhood have long been debated with European Guidelines advising against this practice. Yet over a thousand carriers are identified via newborn bloodspot screening per year in the United Kingdom alone. One of the concerns about identification is the impact it has on an individual's identity. This, in part, will be determined by how parents and peers view carriers, particularly during young adulthood. To address the paucity of research looking at how carriers are perceived by peers, this study sought to explore the views of young adults, who themselves are not carriers, toward carriers. As the narratives around COVID-19 increased, the salience of the term "carrier", the impact of such narratives on perceptions, was also explored. Twenty-five 18-25 year olds participated in a diary-interview study in the United Kingdom during 2021 to explore their perceptions of carriers via hypothetical scenarios. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Interviewees believed carriers would experience stigma-including societal and self-stigma. This was because people used existing illness beliefs to make sense of carrier status about which they had low levels of understanding. Interviewees believed carriers would experience challenges in familial and romantic relationships due to others' judgments. They also believed parents of carriers would experience a burden around making reproductive decisions, with clear views on what society would view as acceptable choices. Importantly interviewees felt knowledge of ones' own carrier status conferred complex communication challenges within relationships. These findings suggest an urgent need for more research and support for young adults entering a key stage in life for identity formation who have knowledge of their carrier status. The results suggest that support targeted toward the carrier regarding navigating complex communication and targeted more broadly to avoid stigma based on misunderstanding should be researched and developed.

Indexed as

Peer GroupAdolescentAdultCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchSocial StigmaUnited KingdomYoung Adultcarrier testingcommunicationCOVID‐19newborn screeningqualitative methodsstigma

Identifiers

PMID38666560
PMCPMC11735185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.