Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38666412›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2024

Performance of Urinalysis Parameters in Predicting Urinary Tract Infection: Does One Size Fit All?

Sonali D Advani, Rebecca North, Nicholas A Turner, Sahra Ahmadi, Julia Denniss, Adero Francis, Rachel Johnson, Anum Hasan, Faryal Mirza, Sarah Pardue and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. State-of-the-Art Review: Recurrent Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections in Women.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. When urine testing to rule out infection does more harm than good.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sonali D AdvaniDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Duke University School of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0001-5162-6482
Rebecca NorthDuke Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Durham, North Carolina.
Nicholas A TurnerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Duke University School of Medicine.
Sahra AhmadiDepartment of Medicine, WellStar Health System, Atlanta, Georgia.
Julia DennissDepartment of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Adero FrancisDepartment of Medicine, WellStar Health System, Atlanta, Georgia.
Rachel JohnsonDepartment of Medicine, WellStar Health System, Atlanta, Georgia.
Anum HasanDepartment of Medicine, Sovah Medical Center, Danville, Virginia.
Faryal MirzaDepartment of Medicine, Sovah Medical Center, Danville, Virginia.
Sarah PardueDepartment of Medicine, Sovah Medical Center, Danville, Virginia.
Meghana RaoDepartment of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Yasmin RosshandlerDepartment of Medicine, WellStar Health System, Atlanta, Georgia.
Helen TangDepartment of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Kenneth E SchmaderDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Duke and Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Deverick J AndersonDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Duke University School of Medicine.

Funding

Duke KURe ProgramK12DK100024 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Cindy Amundsen · 2013 to 2026
$8.4M
CDC HHS 5U54CK000616-02NCEZID CDC HHS U54 CK000616NIDDK NIH HHS K12 DK100024NIDDK NIH HHS K12DK100024NIH
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a multihospital cohort study of 3392 patients, positive urinalysis parameters had poor positive predictive value for diagnosing urinary tract infection (UTI). Combined urinalysis parameters (pyuria or nitrite) performed better than pyuria alone for ruling out UTI. However, performance of all urinalysis parameters was poor in older women.

Indexed as

PyuriaUrinalysisUrinary Tract InfectionsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNitritesPredictive Value of TestsNitritesdiagnostic stewardshipleukocyte esterasenitritepyuriareflex urine cultures

Identifiers

PMID38666412
PMCPMC11426257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.