ArticleThe Neurohospitalist2024
Evaluation of Paroxysmal Events in Critically Ill Patients: Relationship of Primary Diagnosis to Long-Term Electroencephalogram Yield.
Article in The Neurohospitalist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Continuous EEG (cEEG) is indicated for the workup of paroxysmal events. We aimed to assess whether primary admission diagnoses predict the yield of cEEG when ordered for evaluating paroxysmal events. We identified patients in the ICU who underwent at least 6 hours of cEEG monitoring to evaluate paroxysmal events. Primary admission diagnoses were categorized into neurological or non-neurological conditions. cEEG results were dichotomized into presence or absence of epileptiform discharges. We identified 159 recordings that were obtained for the evaluation of paroxysmal events. Most patients (n = 100, 63%) were admitted with primary admission diagnoses of neurological disorders, such as ischemic stroke, or intracranial hemorrhage. We found that patients with primary neurological conditions were more likely to have brain surgeries, abnormal brain imaging, and focal neurological deficits on examination compared to those with primary non-neurological conditions. However, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of epileptiform discharges in cEEG among patients with primary diagnoses of neurological or non-neurological disorders. These results suggest that cEEG is often necessary to evaluate paroxysmal events, even among patients without primary neurological disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.