ArticleResuscitation plus2024
Challenges and best practices of dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A scoping review protocol.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- What factors delay initiation of bystander CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest? Results from an analysis of 200 recorded ambulance calls.Emergency medicine journal : EMJ · 2026Article
- Telephone-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a simulated environment: A pilot exploratory study evaluating first responder adherence and dispatcher performance.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- Experiences, challenges, and best practices of dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a scoping review.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Improved survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with good neurological outcome was observed in association with dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation, increasing the number of bystander-initiated resuscitations and minimizing the no-flow time in the first minutes of cardiac arrest. Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to map and summarise the existing literature on dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation, focusing on reported experiences, challenges, and best practices, highlighting strategies that could improve the provision of cardiopulmonary resuscitation instructions to bystanders during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Inclusion criteria: Studies related to dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation, involving human subjects, with an English abstract. The concept of interest is focused on the methods of provision of dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation analysing specific experiences of implementation, challenges, and best practices, and can be generalized to any country; cultural factors, geographic features, and specific racial or gender-based differences will be analysed and discussed. Methods: Four databases (PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature, and the Cochrane Library) will be searched for studies published from 2018 to 2023. All study designs, including experimental and observational studies, will be assessed for inclusion. Titles and abstracts of identified citations will be screened for inclusion; subsequently, full texts of potentially relevant sources will be assessed for inclusion by two reviewers. Any disagreements between the reviewers will be resolved through discussion. Relevant grey literature (conference proceedings, government documents, and theses) will be analysed and included. Data will be extracted in a standardized form, following Joanna Briggs Institute recommendations. Results will be synthesized and reported using a narrative approach, categorising findings into themes related to the effectiveness of dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation, challenges, and best practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.