ReviewEClinicalMedicine2024
Pregnant women and measles: we need to be vigilant during outbreaks.
Review in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cross-sectional seroprevalence study of measles antibodies among children to identify gaps in population immunity, Ireland, 2024.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2026Article
- COVID-19-related inflammation of the placenta impedes fetal development in pregnant hamsters.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Vaccination Conversations on X in Spanish and Catalan: Qualitative Content Analysis.JMIR infodemiology · 2025Article
- A Nationwide Seroprevalence Study for Measles in Individuals of Fertile Age in Romania.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A number of countries including the UK are currently experiencing large outbreaks of measles affecting mainly young children but also adolescents and young adults. Women of childbearing age are a particular group of concern because the 1988 Wakefield Lancet paper, which falsely asserted a connection between the MMR vaccine and autism, was associated with a large and sharp decline in childhood MMR uptake over several years. This has left large cohorts of non-immune adolescents and young adults (born between 1998 and 2004), including young women who are now of childbearing age and remain susceptible to measles as well as rubella. Pregnant mothers are at higher risk of serious complications, such as pneumonia, with adverse pregnancy complications including fetal loss, premature birth, and neonatal death. Measles infection may also result in subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE), a very rare but very severe and invariably fatal neurodegenerative complication that typically manifests many years after acute measles infection but can have a short-onset latency with a fulminant course in pregnant women. Here, we summarise the epidemiology of measles infection, factors associated with the current measles outbreaks, as well as the risks and outcomes of measles, including SSPE, in pregnancy. We propose an algorithm for clinical management of measles infection in pregnancy. We also highlight the importance of early liaison with local health protection teams for risk assessment, diagnosis and management of suspected measles in pregnancy and close contacts as well as susceptible pregnant women exposed to a person with measles in the community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.