ArticlePsychoradiology2021
Advancing diagnostic performance and clinical applicability of deep learning-driven generative adversarial networks for Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Psychoradiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning of brain-specific biomarkers from EEG.EBioMedicine · 2024Article
- Comparison of deep learning architectures for predicting amyloid positivity in Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, and healthy aging, from T1-weighted brain structural MRI.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Applications of generative adversarial networks in neuroimaging and clinical neuroscience.NeuroImage · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection.2022
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease that severely affects the activities of daily living in aged individuals, which typically needs to be diagnosed at an early stage. Generative adversarial networks (GANs) provide a new deep learning method that show good performance in image processing, while it remains to be verified whether a GAN brings benefit in AD diagnosis. The purpose of this research is to systematically review psychoradiological studies on the application of a GAN in the diagnosis of AD from the aspects of classification of AD state and AD-related image processing compared with other methods. In addition, we evaluated the research methodology and provided suggestions from the perspective of clinical application. Compared with other methods, a GAN has higher accuracy in the classification of AD state and better performance in AD-related image processing (e.g. image denoising and segmentation). Most studies used data from public databases but lacked clinical validation, and the process of quantitative assessment and comparison in these studies lacked clinicians' participation, which may have an impact on the improvement of generation effect and generalization ability of the GAN model. The application value of GANs in the classification of AD state and AD-related image processing has been confirmed in reviewed studies. Improvement methods toward better GAN architecture were also discussed in this paper. In sum, the present study demonstrated advancing diagnostic performance and clinical applicability of GAN for AD, and suggested that the future researchers should consider recruiting clinicians to compare the algorithm with clinician manual methods and evaluate the clinical effect of the algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.