Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38666216›Full record

ArticleTobacco prevention & cessation2024

Nicotine information disclosed online by e-cigarette brands popular with young people.

Clara Rykaczewski, Alayna P Tackett, Elizabeth G Klein, Jill M Singer, Bo Lu, Loren E Wold, Dylan D Wagner, Megan E Roberts

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco prevention & cessation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Clara RykaczewskiCollege of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
Alayna P TackettThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
Elizabeth G KleinCollege of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
Jill M SingerCollege of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
Bo LuCollege of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
Loren E WoldThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
Dylan D WagnerDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
Megan E RobertsCollege of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
The Ohio State University · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

The Ohio State University Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (OSU-TCORS)U54CA287392 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Peter G. Shields, Theodore Lee Wagener · 2023 to 2026
$19.5M
American Heart Association 20YVNR35490079NCI NIH HHS U54 CA287392
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionE-cigarette use is most prevalent among adolescents and young adults - and there are often misperceptions about product risk. The purpose of this study was to determine what nicotine information is provided on e-cigarette brand websites.

methodsBased on national and local surveys, we identified 44 e-cigarette brands commonly used in the US by adolescents and young adults. For each of these brands, their associated websites were analyzed for disclosed nicotine information. Specifically, for each brand's website, we coded whether there was information on nicotine concentration (recorded if a numerical value was provided such as '5% nicotine'), nicotine form (free-base, nicotine salts, or not stated), and nicotine type (tobacco-derived, synthetically derived, or not stated). Coding allowed for both lay (e.g. 'nic salts') as well as scientific (e.g. 'isomers') terms.

resultsOf the 44 brands examined, all provided basic information on nicotine concentration (e.g. '5% nicotine'). However, 23% of brands did not disclose information on nicotine form (i.e. nicotine salt vs free-base), and 66% of brands did not disclose information on nicotine type (i.e. synthetic vs tobacco-derived).

conclusionsOverall, these results suggest that the e-cigarette industry is not fully informing its consumers about the nicotine in their products. Given that nicotine form and type have implications for e-cigarette addiction potential, these findings highlight a public health concern. There is a need for more comprehensive national regulations for mandating product constituents and emissions disclosures.

Indexed as

disclosurese-cigarettesnicotinetobacco

Identifiers

PMID38666216
PMCPMC11044183
OpenAlexW4395481825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.