Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38666174›Full record

ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology

Independent predictors and clinical predictive score of postanesthetic reintubation after general anesthesia: A time-matched, case control study.

Chidchanok Choovongkomol, Thidarat Ariyanuchitkul, Kongtush Choovongkomol, Vipanee Tongjapo

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chidchanok ChoovongkomolDepartment of Anesthesiology, Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
Thidarat AriyanuchitkulDepartment of Anesthesiology, Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
Kongtush ChoovongkomolDepartment of Orthopedics, Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
Vipanee TongjapoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Postanesthetic reintubation is associated with increased morbidities and mortality; however, it can be reduced with defined predictors and using a score as a tool. This study aimed to identify independent predictors and develop a reliable predictive score. Material and Methods: A retrospective, time-matched, case control study was conducted on patients who underwent general anesthesia between October 2017 and September 2021. Using stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis, predictors were determined and the predictive score was developed and validated. Results: Among 230 patients, 46 were in the reintubated group. Significant independent predictors included age >65 years (odds ratio [OR] 2.96 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.23, 7.10]), the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status III-IV (OR 6.60 [95%CI 2.50 17.41]), body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m Conclusion: The independent predictors for postanesthetic reintubation according to this simplified risk-based scoring system designed to aid anesthesiologists before extubation were found to be advanced age, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, obesity, and head and neck surgery.

Indexed as

Airway extubationairway managementanesthesia recovery periodsintubationpredict modelprognostic

Identifiers

PMID38666174
PMCPMC11042086
OpenAlexW4383895614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.