Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38666039›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2024

Simulation of acquisition shifts in T2 weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance images to stress test artificial intelligence segmentation networks.

Christiane Posselt, Mehmet Yigit Avci, Mehmet Yigitsoy, Patrick Schuenke, Christoph Kolbitsch, Tobias Schaeffter, Stefanie Remmele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christiane PosseltUniversity of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Electrical and Industrial Engineering, Landshut, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5672-8601
Mehmet Yigit Avcideepc GmbH, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6228-5933
Mehmet Yigitsoydeepc GmbH, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6598-0933
Patrick SchuenkePhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig and Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3179-4830
Christoph KolbitschPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig and Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4355-8368
Tobias SchaeffterPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig and Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1310-2631
Stefanie RemmeleUniversity of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Electrical and Industrial Engineering, Landshut, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9760-5412

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To provide a simulation framework for routine neuroimaging test data, which allows for "stress testing" of deep segmentation networks against acquisition shifts that commonly occur in clinical practice for T2 weighted (T2w) fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging protocols. Approach: The approach simulates "acquisition shift derivatives" of MR images based on MR signal equations. Experiments comprise the validation of the simulated images by real MR scans and example stress tests on state-of-the-art multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation networks to explore a generic model function to describe the F1 score in dependence of the contrast-affecting sequence parameters echo time (TE) and inversion time (TI). Results: The differences between real and simulated images range up to 19% in gray and white matter for extreme parameter settings. For the segmentation networks under test, the F1 score dependency on TE and TI can be well described by quadratic model functions ( Conclusions: We show that these deviations are in the range of values as may be caused by erroneous or individual differences in relaxation times as described by literature. The coefficients of the F1 model function allow for a quantitative comparison of the influences of TE and TI. Limitations arise mainly from tissues with a low baseline signal (like cerebrospinal fluid) and when the protocol contains contrast-affecting measures that cannot be modeled due to missing information in the DICOM header.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence validationmagnetic resonance image simulationmagnetic resonance imaging sequencemultiple sclerosis lesion segmentationT2w fluid attenuated inversion recovery

Identifiers

PMID38666039
PMCPMC11042016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.