ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Machine learning-based identification of a consensus immune-derived gene signature to improve head and neck squamous cell carcinoma therapy and outcome.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of artificial intelligence in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Bioinformatics reveals the prognostic potential of manganese metabolism-related genes in lung adenocarcinoma.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Article
- An interpretable XGboost algorithm for predicting 30-day mortality in acute pancreatitis using routine biomarkers.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- Pharmacological Targeting of Angiogenesis in Head and Neck Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Diagnosis model of early malignant pulmonary nodules based on clinical laboratory data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a robust cuproptosis related signature for primary glioma via machine learning aided by loop training and validation.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-enabled multi-omics biomarkers for immune checkpoint blockade: mechanisms, predictive modeling, and clinical translation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Development and validation of machine learning models for 30-day mortality prediction in septic shock.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- A Machine Learning Model Based on Clinical Factors to Predict the Efficacy of First-Line Immunochemotherapy for Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer: Retrospective Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Constructing a bladder cancer prognostic model related to exosome using machine learning and identifying THBS1 as a potential target.Cancer cell international · 2025Article
- Machine learning derived development and validation of extracellular matrix related signature for predicting prognosis in adolescents and young adults glioma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine learning for temporary stoma after intestinal resection in surgical decision-making of Crohn's disease.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Machine Learning of Laboratory Data in Predicting 30-Day Mortality for Adult Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis.Journal of clinical immunology · 2024Article
- Machine-learning derived identification of prognostic signature to forecast head and neck squamous cell carcinoma prognosis and drug response.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), an extremely aggressive tumor, is often associated with poor outcomes. The standard anatomy-based tumor-node-metastasis staging system does not satisfy the requirements for screening treatment-sensitive patients. Thus, an ideal biomarker leading to precise screening and treatment of HNSCC is urgently needed. Methods: Ten machine learning algorithms-Lasso, Ridge, stepwise Cox, CoxBoost, elastic network (Enet), partial least squares regression for Cox (plsRcox), random survival forest (RSF), generalized boosted regression modelling (GBM), supervised principal components (SuperPC), and survival support vector machine (survival-SVM)-as well as 85 algorithm combinations were applied to construct and identify a consensus immune-derived gene signature (CIDGS). Results: Based on the expression profiles of three cohorts comprising 719 patients with HNSCC, we identified 236 consensus prognostic genes, which were then filtered into a CIDGS, using the 10 machine learning algorithms and 85 algorithm combinations. The results of a study involving a training cohort, two testing cohorts, and a meta-cohort consistently demonstrated that CIDGS was capable of accurately predicting prognoses for HNSCC. Incorporation of several core clinical features and 51 previously reported signatures, enhanced the predictive capacity of the CIDGS to a level which was markedly superior to that of other signatures. Notably, patients with low CIDGS displayed fewer genomic alterations and higher immune cell infiltrate levels, as well as increased sensitivity to immunotherapy and other therapeutic agents, in addition to receiving better prognoses. The survival times of HNSCC patients with high CIDGS, in particular, were shorter. Moreover, CIDGS enabled accurate stratification of the response to immunotherapy and prognoses for bladder cancer. Niclosamide and ruxolitinib showed potential as therapeutic agents in HNSCC patients with high CIDGS. Conclusion: CIDGS may be used for stratifying risks as well as for predicting the outcome of patients with HNSCC in a clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.