Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38666025›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024

ecGBMsub: an integrative stacking ensemble model framework based on eccDNA molecular profiling for improving IDH wild-type glioblastoma molecular subtype classification.

Zesheng Li, Cheng Wei, Zhenyu Zhang, Lei Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. GEM-CRAP: a fusion architecture for focal seizure detection.Journal of translational medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zesheng Li *Tianjin Neurological Institute, Key Laboratory of Post-Neuro Injury, Neuro-Repair and Regeneration in Central Nervous System, Ministry of Education and Tianjin City, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Cheng Wei *Tianjin Neurological Institute, Key Laboratory of Post-Neuro Injury, Neuro-Repair and Regeneration in Central Nervous System, Ministry of Education and Tianjin City, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Zhenyu ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Lei HanTianjin Neurological Institute, Key Laboratory of Post-Neuro Injury, Neuro-Repair and Regeneration in Central Nervous System, Ministry of Education and Tianjin City, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IDH wild-type glioblastoma (GBM) intrinsic subtypes have been linked to different molecular landscapes and outcomes. Accurate prediction of molecular subtypes of GBM is very important to guide clinical diagnosis and treatment. Leveraging machine learning technology to improve the subtype classification was considered a robust strategy. Several single machine learning models have been developed to predict survival or stratify patients. An ensemble learning strategy combines several basic learners to boost model performance. However, it still lacked a robust stacking ensemble learning model with high accuracy in clinical practice. Here, we developed a novel integrative stacking ensemble model framework (ecGBMsub) for improving IDH wild-type GBM molecular subtype classification. In the framework, nine single models with the best hyperparameters were fitted based on extrachromosomal circular DNA (eccDNA) molecular profiling. Then, the top five optimal single models were selected as base models. By randomly combining the five optimal base models, 26 different combinations were finally generated. Nine different meta-models with the best hyperparameters were fitted based on the prediction results of 26 different combinations, resulting in 234 different stacked ensemble models. All models in ecGBMsub were comprehensively evaluated and compared. Finally, the stacking ensemble model named "XGBoost.Enet-stacking-Enet" was chosen as the optimal model in the ecGBMsub framework. A user-friendly web tool was developed to facilitate accessibility to the XGBoost.Enet-stacking-Enet models (https://lizesheng20190820.shinyapps.io/ecGBMsub/).

Indexed as

brain tumoreccDNAensemble modelIDH wild-type glioblastomamachine learningmolecular subtype

Identifiers

PMID38666025
PMCPMC11043526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.