Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38666014›Full record

ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2024

'Door-to-prophylaxis' as a novel quality improvement metric in prevention of venous thromboembolism following traumatic injury.

Jan-Michael Van Gent, Thomas W Clements, David E Lubkin, Carter W Kaminski, Jonathan K Bates, Mariela Sandoval, Thaddeus J Puzio, Bryan A Cotton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jan-Michael Van GentDivision of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4655-2527
Thomas W ClementsDivision of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
David E LubkinDivision of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Carter W KaminskiDivision of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jonathan K BatesThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Mariela SandovalThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Thaddeus J PuzioDivision of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4150-5956
Bryan A CottonDivision of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4184-6742
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk reduction strategies include early initiation of chemoprophylaxis, reducing missed doses, weight-based dosing and dose adjustment using anti-Xa levels. We hypothesized that time to initiation of chemoprophylaxis would be the strongest modifiable risk for VTE, even after adjusting for competing risk factors. Methods: A prospectively maintained trauma registry was queried for patients admitted July 2017-October 2021 who were 18 years and older and received emergency release blood products. Patients with deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (VTE) were compared to those without (no VTE). Door-to-prophylaxis was defined as time from hospital arrival to first dose of VTE chemoprophylaxis (hours). Univariate and multivariate analyses were then performed between the two groups. Results: 2047 patients met inclusion (106 VTE, 1941 no VTE). There were no differences in baseline or demographic data. VTE patients had higher injury severity score (29 vs 24), more evidence of shock by arrival lactate (4.6 vs 3.9) and received more post-ED transfusions (8 vs 2 units); all p<0.05. While there was no difference in need for enoxaparin dose adjustment or missed doses, door-to-prophylaxis time was longer in the VTE group (35 vs 25 hours; p=0.009). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, every hour delay from time of arrival increased likelihood of VTE by 1.5% (OR 1.015, 95% CI 1.004 to 1.023, p=0.004). Conclusion: The current retrospective study of severely injured patients with trauma who required emergency release blood products found that increased door-to-prophylaxis time was significantly associated with an increased likelihood for VTE. Chemoprophylaxis initiation is one of the few modifiable risk factors available to combat VTE, therefore early initiation is paramount. Similar to door-to-balloon time in treating myocardial infarction and door-to-tPA time in stroke, "door-to-prophylaxis time" should be considered as a hospital metric for prevention of VTE in trauma. Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective study with up to two negative criteria.

Indexed as

metricProphylaxisquality improvementVenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID38666014
PMCPMC11043729
OpenAlexW4395052233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.