Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38666013›Full record

ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2024

Preferential whole blood transfusion during the early resuscitation period is associated with decreased mortality and transfusion requirements in traumatically injured patients.

Daniel Lammers, Parker Hu, Omar Rokayak, Emily W Baird, Richard D Betzold, Zain Hashmi, Jeffrey David Kerby, Jan O Jansen, John B Holcomb

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Whole lot of blood: does more equal better for survival?Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel LammersThe University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9489-3633
Parker HuThe University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Omar RokayakThe University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Emily W BairdThe University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-0128-7643
Richard D BetzoldThe University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Zain HashmiThe University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5867-0272
Jeffrey David KerbyThe University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7368-1124
Jan O JansenThe University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8863-4398
John B HolcombThe University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Whole blood (WB) transfusion represents a promising resuscitation strategy for trauma patients. However, a paucity of data surrounding the optimal incorporation of WB into resuscitation strategies persists. We hypothesized that traumatically injured patients who received a greater proportion of WB compared with blood product components during their resuscitative efforts would have improved early mortality outcomes and decreased transfusion requirements compared with those who received a greater proportion of blood product components. Methods: Retrospective review from our Level 1 trauma center of trauma patients during their initial resuscitation (2019-2022) was performed. WB to packed red blood cell ratios (WB:RBC) were assigned to patients based on their respective blood product resuscitation at 1, 2, 3, and 24 hours from presentation. Multivariable regression models were constructed to assess the relationship of WB:RBC to 4 and 24-hour mortality, and 24-hour transfusion requirements. Results: 390 patients were evaluated (79% male, median age of 33 years old, 48% penetrating injury rate, and a median Injury Severity Score of 27). Overall mortality at 4 hours was 9%, while 24-hour mortality was 12%. A significantly decreased 4-hour mortality was demonstrated in patients who displayed a WB:RBC≥1 at 1 hour (5.9% vs. 12.3%; OR 0.17, p=0.015), 2 hours (5.5% vs. 13%; OR 0.16, p=0.019), and 3 hours (5.5% vs. 13%, OR 0.18, p<0.01), while a decreased 24-hour mortality was displayed in those with a WB:RBC≥1 at 24 hours (7.9% vs. 14.6%, OR 0.21, p=0.01). Overall 24-hour transfusion requirements were significantly decreased within the WB:RBC≥1 cohort (12.1 units vs. 24.4 units, p<0.01). Conclusion: Preferential WB transfusion compared with a balanced transfusion strategy during the early resuscitative period was associated with a lower 4 and 24-hour mortality, as well as decreased 24-hour transfusion requirements, in trauma patients. Future prospective studies are warranted to determine the optimal use of WB in trauma. Level of evidence: Level III/therapeutic.

Indexed as

hemorrhagic shockresuscitationWhole blood

Identifiers

PMID38666013
PMCPMC11043766
OpenAlexW4395052189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.